On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Anand Avati"
> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> > Cc: "Edward Shishkin" , "Gluster Devel" <
> gluster-devel@gluster.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:53:
Nobody has an idea on this one?
> This is master branch, client side:
>
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0 uuid_unpack (in=0xffc0 ,
> uu=0xbf7fd7b0) at ../../contrib/uuid/unpack.c:43
>
> warning: Source file is more recent than executable.
> 43 tm
Hi Emmanuel,
Is it possible to get valgrind reports (or a test case which caused this
crash)? The inode table is corrupted in this case.
regards,
Raghavendra
- Original Message -
> From: "Emmanuel Dreyfus"
> To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:43:50 PM
> Sub
On 05/21/2014 11:42 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On 05/21/2014 10:54 AM, SATHEESARAN wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> This is the issue pointed out by Pranith with regard to Barrier.
>> I was reading through it.
>>
>> But I wanted to bring it to concern
>>
>> -- S
>>
>>
>> Original Message ---
- Original Message -
> From: "Atin Mukherjee"
> To: gluster-devel@gluster.org, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:39:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious failures because of nfs and
> snapshots
>
>
>
> On 05/21/2014 11:42 AM, Atin Mukherjee
On Wed, 21 May 2014 00:06:22 -0700
Anand Avati wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
> pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Anand Avati"
> > > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> > > Cc: "Edward Shishkin" , "Gluster Deve
- Original Message -
> From: "Anand Avati"
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> Cc: "Edward Shishkin" , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:36:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] spurios failures in tests/encryption/crypt.t
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Pranith
- Original Message -
> From: "Edward Shishkin"
> To: "Anand Avati"
> Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:13:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] spurios failures in tests/encryption/crypt.t
>
> On Wed, 21 May 2014 00:06:22 -0700
> Anand
Hi All,
We realised ( Humble, Niels and I) that we dont have any documentation
regarding the $sub, while disscussing over a backport in #gluster-dev.
The below[1] wiki page is a result of this. Comments, feedbacks are welcome.
[1]
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Back
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 07:15:44PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
> Niels,
> This is a good addition. While gluster clients do a reasonably good job at
> detecting dead/hung servers with ping-timeout, the server side detection
> has been rather weak. TCP_KEEPALIVE has helped to some extent, for cases
>
Reminder!!!
The weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 3 mins, in
#gluster-meeting on IRC.
This is a completely public meeting, everyone is encouraged
to attend and be a part of it. :)
To add Agenda items
***
Just add them to the main text of the Etherpad, and be at
the meeting.
KP, Atin and myself did some debugging and found that there was a
deadlock in glusterd.
When creating a volume snapshot, the back-end operation 'taking a
lvm_snapshot and starting brick' for the each brick
are executed in parallel using synctask framework.
brick_start was releasing a big_lock
On 21/05/2014, at 3:57 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> Reminder!!!
>
> The weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 3 mins, in
> #gluster-meeting on IRC.
>
> This is a completely public meeting, everyone is encouraged
> to attend and be a part of it. :)
Thanks to everyone for attending this meeting. :)
A lot of work has been done on getting blockers resolved for the next
3.5 release. We're not there yet, but we're definitely getting close to
releasing a 1st beta.
Humble will follow-up with an email related to the documentation that is
still missing for features introduced with 3.5. We will not
Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
> Is it possible to get valgrind reports
Still no valgrind for NetBSD
> (or a test case which caused this crash)?
It happens after some time, but I have no way
to reproduce it quickly.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
_
Hi all,
Kicked off 21 VM's in Rackspace earlier today, running the regression tests
against master branch.
Only 3 VM's failed out of the 21 (86% PASS, 14% FAIL), with all three being
for the same test:
Test Summary Report
---
./tests/bugs/bug-948686.t (Wstat
On 21/05/2014, at 6:17 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Kicked off 21 VM's in Rackspace earlier today, running the regression tests
> against master branch.
>
> Only 3 VM's failed out of the 21 (86% PASS, 14% FAIL), with all three being
> for the same test:
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
On 02/17/2014 06:22 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 02/17/2014 05:11 PM, Alex Pyrgiotis wrote:
>> On 02/10/2014 07:06 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>> On 02/05/2014 04:10 PM, Alex Pyrgiotis wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering, do we have any news on that?
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> I have started so
- Original Message -
> From: "Justin Clift"
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 11:01:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch
>
> On 21/05/2014, at 6:17 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
hi Raghavendra,
The failures are happening because rebalance status command is failing. I
could see the following logs in glusterd log if I start it with -L DEBUG and
try to recreate the bug. Could you please take a look at it.
Test Summary Report
---
tests/bugs/bug-884455.t
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Justin Clift"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:23:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression testing results for master branch
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Justin Clift"
> >
hi,
I think we should run the regression tests with DEBUG builds so that
GF_ASSERTs are caught. I will work with Justin to make sure we don't see too
many failures before turning it on. I also want the regression tests to catch
memory-corruption (invalid read/write of deallocated memory). For
On 05/22/2014 08:37 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
I think we should run the regression tests with DEBUG builds so that
GF_ASSERTs are caught.
Excellent idea!, lets do it asap.
I will work with Justin to make sure we don't see too many failures before
turning it on. I also want
On 05/21/2014 08:50 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
KP, Atin and myself did some debugging and found that there was a
deadlock in glusterd.
When creating a volume snapshot, the back-end operation 'taking a
lvm_snapshot and starting brick' for the each brick
are executed in parallel using synctask framew
It should be possible. I'll check and do the change.
~kaushal
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> > To: "Justin Clift"
> > Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> > Sent: Thursday, May 2
25 matches
Mail list logo
