On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:53:33AM -0500, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote:
> Thanks and as you have mentioned, I have no clue how my changes
> produced a core due to a NULL pointer in changelog.
It is probably an unrelated bug that was nice enough to pop up here.
Too often people disregard NetBSD
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Julian"
> To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 12:20:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance data migration and corruption
>
> Is this in current release versions?
Yes. This bug is present in
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:26:54PM +0530, Milind Changire wrote:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/14089/consoleFull
>
>
> [08:44:20] ./tests/basic/afr/self-heald.t ..
> not ok 37 Got "0" instead of "1"
> not ok 52 Got "0" instead of "1"
> not ok 67
> Failed
Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 16:22 +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a
écrit :
>
> On 02/08/2016 04:16 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
> > [Removing Milind, adding Pranith]
> >
> > On 02/08/2016 04:09 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:05:44PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> >>> The
On 02/08/2016 09:13 AM, Shyam wrote:
On 02/06/2016 06:36 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
To: "Sakshi Bansal" , "Susant Palai"
Cc: "Gluster Devel"
Hi,
We have two patches(mentioned below) for NSR client and NSR server
available. These patches provide the basic client and server
functionality as described in the design
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bbxwjUmKNhA08wTmqJGkVd_KNCyaAMhpzx4dswokyyA/edit?usp=sharing).
It would be great
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/14096/consoleFull
[11:56:33] ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t ..
not ok 21
not ok 22
not ok 24
not ok 26
not ok 28
not ok 30
not ok 32
not ok 34
not ok 36
Failed 9/40 subtests
[12:10:07]
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/14089/consoleFull
[08:44:20] ./tests/basic/afr/self-heald.t ..
not ok 37 Got "0" instead of "1"
not ok 52 Got "0" instead of "1"
not ok 67
Failed 4/83 subtests
Please advise.
--
Milind
On 02/08/2016 04:16 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
[Removing Milind, adding Pranith]
On 02/08/2016 04:09 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:05:44PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
The patch to add it to bad tests has already been merged, so I guess
this
.t's failure won't pop up
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:05:44PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> The patch to add it to bad tests has already been merged, so I guess this
> .t's failure won't pop up again.
IMo that was a bit too quick. What is the procedure to get out of the
list?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 07:08:03PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> > a. Allowing re-running to tests to make them pass leads to complacency
> with
> > how tests are written.
> > b. A test is bad if it is not
On 02/08/2016 03:37 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:26:54PM +0530, Milind Changire wrote:
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/14089/consoleFull
[08:44:20] ./tests/basic/afr/self-heald.t ..
not ok 37 Got "0" instead of "1"
not ok 52 Got
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:26:22AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Indeed, same problem. But unfortunately it is not very reproductible since
> we need to make a full week of runs to see it again. I am tempted to
> just remove the assertion.
NB: this does not fail on stock NetBSD release: the
On 02/08/2016 04:22 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 02/08/2016 04:16 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
[Removing Milind, adding Pranith]
On 02/08/2016 04:09 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:05:44PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
The patch to add it to bad tests has already
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:44:43PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> The .t has been added to bad tests for now @
I am note sure this is relevant: does it fails again? I am very interested
if it is reproductible.
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13344/, so you can probably rebase your patch.
> I'm
On 02/08/2016 04:00 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:26:22AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Indeed, same problem. But unfortunately it is not very reproductible since
we need to make a full week of runs to see it again. I am tempted to
just remove the assertion.
NB: this
[Removing Milind, adding Pranith]
On 02/08/2016 04:09 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:05:44PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
The patch to add it to bad tests has already been merged, so I guess this
.t's failure won't pop up again.
IMo that was a bit too quick.
I guess
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote:
>
>
> On 02/08/2016 09:13 AM, Shyam wrote:
>
>> On 02/06/2016 06:36 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
To: "Sakshi
On 02/08/2016 08:20 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 07:27:46PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
I don't see any logs in the archive. Did we change something?
I think thay are in a different tarball, in /archives/logs
I think the regression run is not giving that
>>Right. But if there are simultaneous access to the same file from
> any other client and rebalance process, delegations shall not be
>> granted or revoked if granted even though they are operating at
>> different offsets. So if you rely only on delegations, migration may
>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Julian"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 9:08:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance data migration and corruption
>
>
>
> On 02/08/2016
On 02/09/2016 10:27 AM, Raghavendra G wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Soumya Koduri > wrote:
On 02/08/2016 09:13 AM, Shyam wrote:
On 02/06/2016 06:36 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message
Emmanuel,
I don't see any logs in the archive. Did we change something?
Pranith
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
On 02/08/2016 05:04 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le lundi 08 février 2016 à 16:22 +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri a
écrit :
On 02/08/2016 04:16 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
[Removing Milind, adding Pranith]
On 02/08/2016 04:09 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:05:44PM +0530,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 06:25:09PM +0530, Milind Changire wrote:
> Looks like some cores are available as well.
> Please advise.
#0 0xb99912b4 in gf_changelog_reborp_rpcsvc_notify (rpc=0xb7b160f0,
mydata=0xb7b1a830, event=RPCSVC_EVENT_ACCEPT, data=0xb76a4030)
at
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 07:27:46PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> I don't see any logs in the archive. Did we change something?
I think thay are in a different tarball, in /archives/logs
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
___
Gluster-devel
On 02/08/2016 12:18 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Julian"
To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 12:20:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance data migration and corruption
Is this in current
27 matches
Mail list logo