All right, thanks! :)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 2011-07-20 6:38 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:56:54AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:43:06 +0100
>> da...@gbenet.com articulated:
> ..snip
>>> Most people have Microsoft on their desktop or laptop without any
>>> choice. They do
> You just alienated the entire FOSS community.
Please don't claim to speak for the entire FOSS community. You don't. No one
does: not even RMS, Linus or Jordan Hubbard.
Further, a lot of people within the FOSS community are not opposed to
proprietary software: for instance, the BSDs. The co
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:56:54AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:43:06 +0100
> da...@gbenet.com articulated:
..snip
>
> > Most people have Microsoft on their desktop or laptop without any
> > choice. They do not have the freedom of choice. Most people like
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: http://ecn.ab.ca/~brewhaha/gpg/Keyprint_Biometric.mp3.pgp
owF9Vl1oHFUUThpb6eJSfa7oKYJJcH8msWmTWFISH9otplaptPVF7s7c3bnJzNzp
vXey2bZo37QIolKhSBUR/KEovvRFxBeh9lUQf6AgaB8VXwTpW/3OnZ20VTAksDv3
3HO+853vfJM36xNj28YfeWrt8k/u/N/jn+/c0b2/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 2011-07-20 9:39 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:23:12AM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 03:25, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
>>> I'm presenting the script here in case someone else finds
>>> it useful, but really, it's emb
I confirme, similar problem on gnupg-2.0.17
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/20/2011 09:55, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> Yes, of course. I'm not arguing that it isn't, but rather the documentation
> could be more complete, such as restoring that entropy after exhaustion.
Some of us run systems that don't have that issue. :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 2011-07-20 4:31 AM, Richard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:57, Robert J. Hansen
> wrote:
>> Is there some particular reason why you send messages in an
>> obfuscated format?
>
> how is that working anyway? Apparently GPG automatically decryp
On 19/07/11 01:20, J. Ottosson wrote:
> Example: I have this newly installed GPG, through GPG4WIN. After having done
> some checking and searching in manuals and on the list, I have come to
> conclusion that entering the command "gpg --card-status" should make the
> secret
> key stubs appear in th
Hi all!
I'm not sure if I configure the gnupg package correctly, but when I enable
OCSP I'm unable to validate certificates (gpgsm --with-validation -k)
When I add "enable-ocsp" to gpgsm.conf and "allow-ocsp" to dirmngr.conf I get
either "Unknown system error" or an "End of file error".
Even whe
> Ah, cool. However, as the gpg(1) manual states, --gen-random removes
> precious entropy from your system.
But that's really the point. If you want strong random data, that data
should have high entropy. But that entropy needs to come from
somewhere -- i.e., your system.
What I'd find more inter
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:43:06 +0100
da...@gbenet.com articulated:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> I don't hate any one for using Microsoft - I even beta-tested Windows
> 3.11 and Windows 95/98 till I realised that though we filed bug
> reports Microsoft in Ireland took no notice.
I don't want to get into a long
Kara karadenizi at gmail.com wrote on
Wed Jul 20 02:18:16 CEST 2011 :
>> Is it a bad idea to place your secring in dropbox?
>Using a decent password generator and specifying a mix of upper
and
lower case letters, digits, and special characters, how many total
characters -- as a minimum -- would
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:42:33PM -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > Still with the HTML? This excerpt is from the Fedora mail list but it
> > applies to all lists:
>
> It applies to those lists which have a policy on HTML mail identical to that
> of the Fedora mailing list. This is not the sam
Deleted. I may be a newb to this list, but I believe etiquette is to post an OT
so that we can skip stuff like this.
Thanks,
-Devin
-Original Message-
From: "da...@gbenet.com"
Sender: gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:43:06
To:
Subject: Re: Where are those stubs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:24:14 +0100
> da...@gbenet.com articulated:
>
>> I much prefer to send and receive in plain txt. When I started out
>> some 25 years ago it was the norm and the convention to do so. I ran
>> a BBS (Bullet Board
[increasingly offtopic rant]
Well, a *proper* MUA would send both text/html and text/plain
bodyparts in a multipart/alternative container, so that a *proper* CUI
MUA could render the important part of the message without all the
markup. But the evidence suggests that many maintainers of
HTML-poss
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:24:14 +0100
da...@gbenet.com articulated:
> I much prefer to send and receive in plain txt. When I started out
> some 25 years ago it was the norm and the convention to do so. I ran
> a BBS (Bullet Board System) and later became an ISP (Internet Service
> Provider). Most peo
[ Sent to gnupg-devel a couple of days ago but it never went through;
perhaps -devel is subscriber-only. Apologies if you eventually see it
twice. ]
Here is a patch (quick and dirty) to show a session key for an encrypted
file using --show-session-key even if the encrypted file is truncated.
On 20-07-2011 12:31, Richard wrote:
> how is that working anyway? Apparently GPG automatically decrypted
> those messages for me. How were they generated? What is that? :)
They were only signed, but not in plaintext but Base 64 encoded.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Johan Wevers
___
> how is that working anyway? Apparently GPG automatically decrypted
> those messages for me. How were they generated? What is that? :)
:compressed packet: algo=1
:onepass_sig packet: keyid 1E3B6A9CD77480F6
version 3, sigclass 0x00, digest 2, pubkey 1, last=1
:literal data packet:
mode b (
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 03:57, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Is there some particular reason why you send messages in an obfuscated format?
how is that working anyway? Apparently GPG automatically decrypted
those messages for me. How were they generated? What is that? :)
Thanks,
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Devin Fisher wrote:
> I prefer a homogeneous environment because once a plaintext user replies to
> an HTML message the HTML tags inundate the message and it becomes mostly
> unreadable. So in my opinion, either all plaintext or all HTML.
>
> -Dev
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 03:25, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> I'm presenting the script here in case someone else finds it useful, but
> really, it's embarrassingly simple.
gpg --gen-random --armor 1 16
Might even be a bit simpler ;-)
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahm
I prefer a homogeneous environment because once a plaintext user replies to an
HTML message the HTML tags inundate the message and it becomes mostly
unreadable. So in my opinion, either all plaintext or all HTML.
-Devin
-Original Message-
From: "Robert J. Hansen"
Sender: gnupg-users-bou
26 matches
Mail list logo
