Re: Including public key

2011-07-30 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Saturday 30 July 2011 at 3:22:12 AM, in , Jay Litwyn wrote: >>> although it would be tricky to fake photo-id >>> production on skype. Photo-id doesn't make very good >>> single frames, but change the angle on television and >>> those chrome

Re: Including public key

2011-07-29 Thread Jay Litwyn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 2011-07-29 6:03 PM, MFPA wrote: > Hi > > > On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 4:22:52 PM, in > , Jay Litwyn wrote: > > >> Do not sign my photo until you see me in person, > > OK, fair enough. If the key has WoT signatures from people I trust > to have such a po

Re: Including public key

2011-07-29 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 7:15:16 PM, in , Jay Litwyn wrote: > That's why "void" appears in my public key. Neither PGP > 10, nor gpg were going to allow me to leave my given > and family names blank; separate, and yet _linked_ > elements of

Re: Including public key

2011-07-29 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 4:22:52 PM, in , Jay Litwyn wrote: > Do not sign my photo until you see me in person, OK, fair enough. If the key has WoT signatures from people I trust to have such a policy. But in the case of the OP's key with o

Re: Including public key

2011-07-28 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 7/28/11 3:46 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > Please communicate in a way where I don't have to > read every other sentence twice to get what you are trying to tell us. I wunder if iu've red the "Plan for xe Impruvment of Ingliy Speling," popyularly atributed to Mark Twain? http://everything2.com/ti

Re: Including public key

2011-07-28 Thread Jay Litwyn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 2011-07-28 10:08 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: (...) >> It's quite a new system, but supported by the W3C and on it's way >> to becoming a standard. For more info see the video at: >> http://webid.info/ (...) paypal and your bank are unlikely subscribers to thi

Re: Including public key

2011-07-28 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 28/07/11 20:15, Jay Litwyn wrote: > In my case, that iz likely, because I yuuz only screen names on USENET. yuuz? That's where I draw the line. This mailing list is for communication, not showing your "1337 skillz". So please communicate in a way where I don't have to read every other sentence

Re: Including public key

2011-07-28 Thread Jay Litwyn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 2011-07-28 10:08 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > On 28 July 2011 16:01, MFPA wrote: Hi > > > On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 12:53:41 PM, in > , Jay Litwyn wrote: > Attaching a photo to your public key might help. So might putting a phone number on you

Re: Including public key

2011-07-28 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 28 July 2011 16:01, MFPA wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi > > > On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 12:53:41 PM, in > , Jay Litwyn wrote: > >> Attaching a photo to your public key might >> help. So might putting a phone number on your public >> key. > > I'm not too conv

Re: Including public key

2011-07-28 Thread Jay Litwyn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 2011-07-28 8:01 AM, MFPA wrote: > Hi > > > On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 12:53:41 PM, in > , Jay Litwyn wrote: > >> Attaching a photo to your public key might help. So might putting >> a phone number on your public key. > > I'm not too convinced a photo wou

Re: Including public key

2011-07-28 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 12:53:41 PM, in , Jay Litwyn wrote: > Attaching a photo to your public key might > help. So might putting a phone number on your public > key. I'm not too convinced a photo would help much. I could create a key and

Re: Including public key

2011-07-28 Thread Jay Litwyn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 2011-07-27 8:25 PM, Len Cooley wrote: > Well, let me ask you this. Is it useful/useless/ridiculous/orwhat to > attach your public key as a sig at the end of an email, such as > below? > It depends on the environment of your receiver. Would they be subject t

Re: Including public key

2011-07-28 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:29, k...@grant-olson.net said: > attacker could have forged both. They could in other circumstances as > well, but it's less likely for someone to forge both a public key on the > keyservers (or your personal website, or your business card, etc), and a > signature on a forg

Re: Including public key

2011-07-27 Thread Grant Olson
On 7/27/2011 10:25 PM, Len Cooley wrote: > Well, let me ask you this. Is it useful/useless/ridiculous/orwhat to > attach your public key as a sig at the end of an email, such as below? > Unless you're trying to keep your key 'off the grid' I'd just send the key to the keyservers. Then people who

Re: Including public key

2011-07-27 Thread David Shaw
On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:25 PM, Len Cooley wrote: > Well, let me ask you this. Is it useful/useless/ridiculous/orwhat to > attach your public key as a sig at the end of an email, such as below? It depends on what you're trying to accomplish. In my experience, it's generally felt to be somewhat im

Re: Including public key

2011-07-27 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 7/27/11 10:25 PM, Len Cooley wrote: > Well, let me ask you this. Is it useful/useless/ridiculous/orwhat to > attach your public key as a sig at the end of an email, such as below? As with most things in life, "it depends." There are almost certainly environments in which doing so makes a lot o

Including public key

2011-07-27 Thread Len Cooley
Well, let me ask you this. Is it useful/useless/ridiculous/orwhat to attach your public key as a sig at the end of an email, such as below? -- My GPG public key -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: SKS 1.1.0 mQGiBEZ7KUMRBAD1FiEDDKjhdIc/VL3DloRPC4x89KPm2HttDMhoUexNIa99rMLq1H3bKFUS WCd03