-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 30 July 2011 at 3:22:12 AM, in
, Jay Litwyn wrote:
>>> although it would be tricky to fake photo-id
>>> production on skype. Photo-id doesn't make very good
>>> single frames, but change the angle on television and
>>> those chrome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 2011-07-29 6:03 PM, MFPA wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 4:22:52 PM, in
> , Jay Litwyn wrote:
>
>
>> Do not sign my photo until you see me in person,
>
> OK, fair enough. If the key has WoT signatures from people I trust
> to have such a po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 7:15:16 PM, in
, Jay Litwyn wrote:
> That's why "void" appears in my public key. Neither PGP
> 10, nor gpg were going to allow me to leave my given
> and family names blank; separate, and yet _linked_
> elements of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 4:22:52 PM, in
, Jay Litwyn wrote:
> Do not sign my photo until you see me in person,
OK, fair enough. If the key has WoT signatures from people I trust to
have such a policy. But in the case of the OP's key with o
On 7/28/11 3:46 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> Please communicate in a way where I don't have to
> read every other sentence twice to get what you are trying to tell us.
I wunder if iu've red the "Plan for xe Impruvment of Ingliy Speling,"
popyularly atributed to Mark Twain?
http://everything2.com/ti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 2011-07-28 10:08 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
(...)
>> It's quite a new system, but supported by the W3C and on it's way
>> to becoming a standard. For more info see the video at:
>> http://webid.info/
(...)
paypal and your bank are unlikely subscribers to thi
On 28/07/11 20:15, Jay Litwyn wrote:
> In my case, that iz likely, because I yuuz only screen names on USENET.
yuuz? That's where I draw the line. This mailing list is for communication, not
showing your "1337 skillz". So please communicate in a way where I don't have to
read every other sentence
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 2011-07-28 10:08 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> On 28 July 2011 16:01, MFPA wrote: Hi
>
>
> On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 12:53:41 PM, in
> , Jay Litwyn wrote:
>
Attaching a photo to your public key might help. So might
putting a phone number on you
On 28 July 2011 16:01, MFPA wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi
>
>
> On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 12:53:41 PM, in
> , Jay Litwyn wrote:
>
>> Attaching a photo to your public key might
>> help. So might putting a phone number on your public
>> key.
>
> I'm not too conv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 2011-07-28 8:01 AM, MFPA wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 12:53:41 PM, in
> , Jay Litwyn wrote:
>
>> Attaching a photo to your public key might help. So might putting
>> a phone number on your public key.
>
> I'm not too convinced a photo wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 12:53:41 PM, in
, Jay Litwyn wrote:
> Attaching a photo to your public key might
> help. So might putting a phone number on your public
> key.
I'm not too convinced a photo would help much. I could create
a key and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 2011-07-27 8:25 PM, Len Cooley wrote:
> Well, let me ask you this. Is it useful/useless/ridiculous/orwhat to
> attach your public key as a sig at the end of an email, such as
> below?
>
It depends on the environment of your receiver.
Would they be subject t
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:29, k...@grant-olson.net said:
> attacker could have forged both. They could in other circumstances as
> well, but it's less likely for someone to forge both a public key on the
> keyservers (or your personal website, or your business card, etc), and a
> signature on a forg
On 7/27/2011 10:25 PM, Len Cooley wrote:
> Well, let me ask you this. Is it useful/useless/ridiculous/orwhat to
> attach your public key as a sig at the end of an email, such as below?
>
Unless you're trying to keep your key 'off the grid' I'd just send the
key to the keyservers. Then people who
On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:25 PM, Len Cooley wrote:
> Well, let me ask you this. Is it useful/useless/ridiculous/orwhat to
> attach your public key as a sig at the end of an email, such as below?
It depends on what you're trying to accomplish. In my experience, it's
generally felt to be somewhat im
On 7/27/11 10:25 PM, Len Cooley wrote:
> Well, let me ask you this. Is it useful/useless/ridiculous/orwhat to
> attach your public key as a sig at the end of an email, such as below?
As with most things in life, "it depends." There are almost certainly
environments in which doing so makes a lot o
Well, let me ask you this. Is it useful/useless/ridiculous/orwhat to
attach your public key as a sig at the end of an email, such as below?
--
My GPG public key
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: SKS 1.1.0
mQGiBEZ7KUMRBAD1FiEDDKjhdIc/VL3DloRPC4x89KPm2HttDMhoUexNIa99rMLq1H3bKFUS
WCd03
17 matches
Mail list logo