Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
>> I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs
>> much, so maybe I've just missed it previously. It seems that 1.4.6
>> changed the texinfo file to use the dircategory "GNU Utilities"
>> just as 2.0.1 d
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much,
> so maybe I've just missed it previously. It seems that 1.4.6 changed
> the texinfo file to use the dircategory "GNU Utilities" just as 2.0.1
> does. 1.4.5 used GnuPG. Wi
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 06:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I am MacOS X user (10.4.6), unable till now to compile 2.0.1 (posted a
> few messages explaining why).
> If you are MacOS X user, could you please explain how you succeeded to
> compile 2.0.1. Thanks.
I know that there are some problems. Pleas
Charly Avital wrote:
> I am MacOS X user (10.4.6), unable till now to compile 2.0.1 (posted
> a few messages explaining why).
> If you are MacOS X user, could you please explain how you succeeded
> to compile 2.0.1. Thanks.
Sorry, I'm using linux.
--
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | UR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Zullinger wrote the following on 12/6/06 11:37 PM:
> I was updating my system to 1.4.6 today and noticed the following in
> the make install output (I've got 2.0.1 installed already):
>
> install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file `gn
I was updating my system to 1.4.6 today and noticed the following in
the make install output (I've got 2.0.1 installed already):
install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file `gnupg'
I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much,
so maybe I've just missed it previ
