Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P

2018-08-28 Thread Sobey, Richard A
Johnson Sent: 20 August 2018 17:55 To: gpfsug main discussion list Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P I have one storage pool that was recently doubled, and another pool migrated there using mmapplypolicy. The new half is only 50% full, and the old half is 94% full. Disks

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P; using QOS features

2018-08-21 Thread Marc A Kaplan
f mmlsqos is one or two index values. The doc for mmlsqos explains this and the qosplotfine.pl script is an example of how to use it. ) From: "Luis Bolinches" To: "gpfsug main discussion list" Date: 08/21/2018 12:56 AM Subject:Re: [gpfsug-discuss

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P

2018-08-20 Thread Luis Bolinches
Hi You can enable QoS first to see the activity while on inf value to see the current values of usage and set the li is later on. Those limits are modificable online so even in case you have (not your case it seems) less activity times those can be increased for replication then and Lowe again on

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P

2018-08-20 Thread david_johnson
Yes the arrays are in different buildings. We want to spread the activity over more servers if possible but recognize the extra load that rebalancing would entail. The system is busy all the time. I have considered using QOS when we run policy migrations but haven’t yet because I don’t know wh

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P

2018-08-20 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 14:02:05 -0400, "Frederick Stock" said: > Note you have two additional NSDs in the 33 failure group than you do in > the 23 failure group. You may want to change one of those NSDs in failure > group 33 to be in failure group 23 so you have equal storage space in both > failure

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P

2018-08-20 Thread Alex Chekholko
.ibm.com > > > > From:David Johnson > To: gpfsug main discussion list > Date: 08/20/2018 12:55 PM > Subject:[gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P > Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org > -

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P

2018-08-20 Thread david_johnson
iscussion list > Date:08/20/2018 12:55 PM > Subject:[gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P > Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org > > > > I have one storage pool that was recently doubled, and another pool migrated > ther

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P

2018-08-20 Thread Frederick Stock
To: gpfsug main discussion list Date: 08/20/2018 12:55 PM Subject:[gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org I have one storage pool that was recently doubled, and another pool migrated there using mmapplypolicy. The

[gpfsug-discuss] Rebalancing with mmrestripefs -P

2018-08-20 Thread David Johnson
I have one storage pool that was recently doubled, and another pool migrated there using mmapplypolicy. The new half is only 50% full, and the old half is 94% full. Disks in storage pool: cit_10tb (Maximum disk size allowed is 516 TB) d05_george_23 50.49T 23 No Yes