Hi,
take a look at the mdout.mdp grompp output file. There you should see
how the pull-related parameters are called in the version you were using.
Maybe you just need to use minus signs instead of the underlines.
Best,
Carsten
> On 05 Oct 2015, at 04:25, Stella Nickerson wrote:
>
> I am at
Dear users,
If I dont define pbc=no, what is the default type for gromacs? Is it right
if I dont use pbc=no in my system while using grid for ns-type?
thank you.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before post
After grompp command i got this error
Fatal error
unknown bond_atomtype CH1
Please help me solve his error
thanks in advance
Surbhi
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http
Hi Surbhi,
You are getting this error due to the Atomtype CH1 is not defined in
your forcefield. Try to see if the CH1 is defined in atomtype.atp as well
as ffbonded.itp
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:20 PM, surbhi mahajan
wrote:
> After grompp command i got this error
>
> Fatal error
> unknown b
Thank you for your great help on specbond.dat file. I defined it and I
could go ahead until Energy minimization step. I have used this minim.mdp
file
; minim.mdp - used as input into grompp to generate em.tpr
; Parameters describing what to do, when to stop and what to save
integrator= steep
Hi Erik,
Thank you for fast reply.
I knew about differences between definitions of angle criterion in Gromacs,
VMD and cpptraj but I didn't realize that there is nontrivial relationship
between these two different definitions.
I have gone deeper into this problem and now it makes sence to me.
Tha
Dear Gromacs user,
The coarse grained simulation was done by using the files prepared by the SMOG
server.
However, i got an error as follows:
Not all bonded interactions have been properly assigned to the domain
decomposition cells
A list of missing interactions:
LJ-14 of 29
Hello everybody;
I want to install gromacs-5.0.5 in ubuntu-14.04 using the installation
instruction in the website "gromacs.org", but in the "cmake ..
-DGMX_BUILD_OWN_FFTW=ON -DREGRESSIONTEST_DOWNLOAD=ON" line I got this error:
-- No compatible CUDA toolkit found (v4.0+), disabling native GPU acc
Hi,
Often the XC40 has a different kind of login vs compute node. Here it looks
like you have configured for the compute node, but are actually using a
toolchain to build for the login node. Use the Cray MPI wrapper compiler
configured to use gcc as its back end as the compiler to give to CMake, a
Hi,
Look at atom 380 and see why the forces might be high.
Mark
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:15 AM faride badalkhani
wrote:
> Thank you for your great help on specbond.dat file. I defined it and I
> could go ahead until Energy minimization step. I have used this minim.mdp
> file
>
> ; minim.mdp -
Hi,
See top of
http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/5.1/user-guide/mdp-options.html
regarding
defaults. Or you can leave it blank and inspect what gmx grompp writes to
the mdout.mdp. Whether any PBC setting makes sense depends what you're
trying to do, which we don't know.
Mark
On Mon, Oct 5,
Hi,
Things change between versions when we recognize limitations of old
decisions. 5.0 certainly recognizes pull-ngroups, so I think you were using
a non-matching grompp at some point. You do have the option of reading the
.mdp documentation for the version you're using. :-) (Of course, if it's
ou
IIRC, Mark Abraham wrote that there are some issues with implementation
of vsites with amber ffs in GROMACS.
Any more details? Is it possible to use amber99sb-ildn with -vsite
option to speed up calculation?
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Su
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:49 PM Timofey Tyugashev
wrote:
> IIRC, Mark Abraham wrote that there are some issues with implementation
> of vsites with amber ffs in GROMACS.
>
Shrug, that's meaningless without context.
> Any more details? Is it possible to use amber99sb-ildn with -vsite
> opt
Hi Mark,
Thanks. It seems the default is pbc =xyz. But my question is if I don't use
PBC, can I use grid, or grid is only meaningful when PBC is defined?
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:07 AM, mah maz wrote:
> Dear users,
>
> If I dont define pbc=no, what is the default type for gromacs? Is it right
>
On 10/5/15 2:26 AM, Golnaz Roudsari wrote:
Dear all
I want to use bromide for neutralize my system. I wrote genion -s ions.tpr
-c file.gro -p topol.top -pname K -nname BR -nn 24. After I cheked it the
gromacs read Boron intead of bromide. I wrote command -nname BR -nn 24. and
I did not use K bu
Hi,
I don't really remember. I suspect not, so I would look up the docs for
ns-type, which should mention limitations, and otherwise try it out. grompp
and/or mdrun are pretty good at complaining about things they can't do.
Mark
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:56 PM mah maz wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> Thank
Hi,
That unfortunately doesn't tell us anything, since 1.5GB can still be read
with 32-bit file operations. You didn't answer any of the questions: can
you open very small xtc files, or very large (requiring 64-bit access)
gro/pdb files, or not? We are still thinking that you should be able to
ope
Hello Users,
I need to calculate the cohesive energy for my system, for which the
enthalpy of vaporization is needed. Am I right to assume that just the
non-bonded interaction energy (potential energy) is required to calculate
the enthalpy of vaporization ?
Many Thanks!
-Pallavi Banerjee
--
Gro
On 10/5/15 10:53 AM, Pallavi Banerjee wrote:
Hello Users,
I need to calculate the cohesive energy for my system, for which the
enthalpy of vaporization is needed. Am I right to assume that just the
non-bonded interaction energy (potential energy) is required to calculate
the enthalpy of vapori
Oh, that was easy, should have asked about what the value of "GMX_SIMD" is
in the CMake cache. Given that the GROMACS build system enabled AVX2 SIMD
on your VM which seems to not support anything above SSE2, it's not a
surprise that the first math instruction crashes the run.
Immediate solution: s
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:15 AM, kevin chen wrote:
> Dear Gromacs users,
>
> I am trying to build gromacs on our latest supercomputer CRAY XC40, but the
> following errors using gcc and fftw. Here's my list of module loaded and
> install script, can anyone give any instructions?
>
> ==
Hi,
Indeed, although having the craype-ivybridge module loaded (when perhaps it
was not loaded at CMake time) does not look like it would help.
Mark
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:47 PM Szilárd Páll wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:15 AM, kevin chen wrote:
>
> > Dear Gromacs users,
> >
> > I am tr
This non-zero value becomes quite significant if you are dealing with
highly flexible molecules -
Internal molecular dynamics effects are different in the gas and liquid
phases.
Rasoul
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Pallavi Banerjee <
pallavis...@students.iiserpune.ac.in> wrote:
> Hello Users
Correct me if I am wrong, please. Ugas would be obtained from a simulation
of a single molecule in vacuum. And U liq would be the total potential
energy of the system (which is given by g_energy) minus the total bonded
potential energy (bonds+angles+dihedrals). Am I thinking right?
Thanks.
-Palla
On 10/5/15 1:50 PM, Pallavi Banerjee wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, please. Ugas would be obtained from a simulation
of a single molecule in vacuum. And U liq would be the total potential
energy of the system (which is given by g_energy) minus the total bonded
potential energy (bonds+angles+d
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 10/5/15 1:50 PM, Pallavi Banerjee wrote:
>
>> Correct me if I am wrong, please. Ugas would be obtained from a simulation
>> of a single molecule in vacuum. And U liq would be the total potential
>> energy of the system (which is given
On 10/5/15 2:01 PM, Rasoul Nasiri wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 10/5/15 1:50 PM, Pallavi Banerjee wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, please. Ugas would be obtained from a simulation
of a single molecule in vacuum. And U liq would be the total potential
ener
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 10/5/15 2:01 PM, Rasoul Nasiri wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 10/5/15 1:50 PM, Pallavi Banerjee wrote:
>>>
>>> Correct me if I am wrong, please. Ugas would be obtained from a
sim
Hi there,
I want to calculate ht RMSF of the carbon alpha. First which atoms are used if
I calculate the RMSF per residue with -res and how can I calculate the RMSF of
carbon alpha or NH vector etc? Can’t seem to find an input except for the group
of the alignment for the -fit
Thank you,
Max
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Mark Abraham
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Indeed, although having the craype-ivybridge module loaded (when perhaps it
> was not loaded at CMake time) does not look like it would help.
>
That certainly does not look right (either), if the target is AVX2 (and
AFAIK XC40 means H
I think I can answer my own question again. The group you use for root mean
square calculation is also the RMSF group. If the group has more than one atom
per residue and I use -res I get the average RMSF of all atoms per residue.
Hope this is correct.
Max
> On Oct 5, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Ebert
Oh infact no thats not the case it is still the RMSF of all atoms in the
residue. So back to my initial question. How can I calculate the RMSF on the Ca
of each residue?
Sorry if this caused any confusion.
Max
> On Oct 5, 2015, at 4:36 PM, Ebert Maximilian wrote:
>
> I think I can answer my
Hi Ebert,
Use C-alpha as the group. Yes, it will be used for fitting and calculation
of the RMSF.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Oct 5, 2015 22:44, "Ebert Maximilian" wrote:
> Oh infact no thats not the case it is still the RMSF of all atoms in the
> residue. So back to my initial question. How can I calcu
Thanks for the clarification Tsjerk. So my previous assumption was right.
Basically if I want to align on the backbone but want the RMSF of Calpha I need
to align first, save the trajectory and do RMSF with -nofit right?
Max
> On Oct 5, 2015, at 4:54 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote:
>
> Hi Ebert,
Thank you, Professor Farais de Moura. That method of integrating to an ideal
gas makes sense. However, I'm having trouble figuring out how to deal with the
temperature. I hope my question isn't too basic, but I can't find any examples
online and I know I am misunderstanding how it works. I want
My system is one molecule of Propanamide. I need to see if my force field
makes the molecule water soluble or not, for which I would need its
cohesive energy, and this in turn would require the heat of vaporization.
So, I should include the total potential energy for both gas and liquid
phase in th
Hi,
Sorry for the confusion. Now I have generated a small xtc file and a very
big pdb file. I can able to access small xtc file but unable to read the
large pdb file (~10GB) (terminating with the same error as reported
earlier). Does it mean my installation has some problem?
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at
GROMACS users,
I was trying to perform a MD simulation of a system with a protein with Ag+
metal ion but realized that GROMACS does not have parameters for the Ag+
ion. I tried to include the parameters in the ion.itp file but did not
succeed yet. Does anyone knows the right procedure to introduc
GROMACS users,
I was trying to perform a MD simulation of a system with a protein with Ag+
metal ion but realized that GROMACS does not have parameters for the Ag+
ion. I tried to include the parameters in the ion.itp file but did not
succeed yet. Does anyone knows the right procedure to introduc
Right :)
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Ebert Maximilian
wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification Tsjerk. So my previous assumption was right.
> Basically if I want to align on the backbone but want the RMSF of Calpha I
> need to align first, save the trajectory and do RMSF with
41 matches
Mail list logo