Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually it's funny, I didn't even realize we were using the color
> code... because I have seen no colors anywhere. Marco, does that do
> anything for you?
Colors are supported and used to draw the menu. One of the first
things GRUB does is printin
First the northbridge/southbridge. Here is a pic..
++ +--+
| CPU |--| L2 CACHE |
++ +--+
|
Hi Stefan,
thanks for your reply,
but I am still not very clear on how this is done by say bios on x86
plattforms, ?
can u please expain in more detail abt this north bridge , south
bridge thing .. ?
I would like to try and recreate the same way of probing for our set
up, may be its not that por
On May 10, 2005, at 1:11 PM, Marco Gerards wrote:
Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Also, this patch allows you to boot from the OF commandline,
overriding
the defaults. Example:
boot enet:,grubof prefix=foo; debug=bar
This looks like a nice feature to me, especially for development
On May 10, 2005, at 2:59 PM, Paul Nasrat wrote:
Loading ELF
method not found; ihandle=ffbc6f80 phandle=ff848300 method
not found; ihandle=ffbc6f80 phandle=ff848300 method
not found; ihandle=ffbc6f80 phandle=ff848300 method not found;
ihandle=ffbc6f80 phandle=ff848300 method not found;
ihandle=
On May 10, 2005, at 2:59 PM, Paul Nasrat wrote:
Ignore the Default catch that seems to be resolved for me.
Hmm, if you have any ideas, I'd still like to know how you got that
error... Experimental toolchain?
-Hollis
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-dev
On May 10, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Marco Gerards wrote:
Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
--- include/grub/powerpc/ieee1275/kernel.h 4 Jan 2005 14:01:45
- 1.1
+++ include/grub/powerpc/ieee1275/kernel.h 10 May 2005 01:27:36 -
@@ -21,6 +21,6 @@
#define GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_HEADER 1
/*
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 20:16 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Paul Nasrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 0 > boot hd:2,\grubof.modules load-size=2e220 adler32=e04b6e6d
>
> What are load-size and adler32 used for? Don't you need a `;' here?
>
> > Loading ELF
> > method not found; ihandle=ffbc6f8
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 20:16 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Paul Nasrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 0 > boot hd:2,\grubof.modules load-size=2e220 adler32=e04b6e6d
>
> What are load-size and adler32 used for? Don't you need a `;' here?
They were auto added to console by OF - not me. Hold on
Paul Nasrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 0 > boot hd:2,\grubof.modules load-size=2e220 adler32=e04b6e6d
What are load-size and adler32 used for? Don't you need a `;' here?
> Loading ELF
> method not found; ihandle=ffbc6f80 phandle=ff848300 method
> not found; ihandle=ffbc6f80 phandle=ff84830
Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We're doing a lot of useless work in cmain().
Agreed.
> Also, this patch allows you to boot from the OF commandline, overriding
> the defaults. Example:
> boot enet:,grubof prefix=foo; debug=bar
This looks like a nice feature to me, especially
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 00:05 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> We're doing a lot of useless work in cmain().
>
> Also, this patch allows you to boot from the OF commandline, overriding
> the defaults. Example:
> boot enet:,grubof prefix=foo; debug=bar
I thought this might work if I'm using grub
Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've found a few more things that needed cleaning, so here is the
> updated patch. I have tested it.
It looks fine to me. I have a few questions:
> (grub_ieee1275_next_property): Likewise. Change type of first argument
> to grub_ieee127
Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to rename the PPC executable from "grubof" to "grub". If
> nothing else, it will avoid the question "is it grubof.cfg or
> grub.cfg?". Thoughts?
What I would prefer is _grub or so. To make clear it is not usable
just like this. We don't wa
Hollis Blanchard [Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:02:06PM -0500]:
> I'd like to rename the PPC executable from "grubof" to "grub". If
> nothing else, it will avoid the question "is it grubof.cfg or
> grub.cfg?". Thoughts?
grub.cfg, as a user I am not interesed it "oh there is openfirmware",
but I simply
* alfred hitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050510 12:23]:
> anyways, how can u get this from processor also ?
The processor has little to nothing to do with this.. it's dependent on
the northbridge and southbridge.
> I vaguely remember see'ing some code where someone on a i386 based
> plattform but WIT
I agree with u,
if there are holes and all in the area being scanned also with this fail ?
anyways, how can u get this from processor also ?
I vaguely remember see'ing some code where someone on a i386 based
plattform but WITHOUT bios, used smbus protocol to talk to a device
across PIIX4 to get
"coly li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> write and verify means: you read the content from location X, and
> change the value, then write back to location X; then re-read the
> content from X, if the value is what you write, the location X is
> valid; otherwise, maybe the location X is invalid.
Th
alfred hitch:
Bios can provide us a memory map table, for it knows the initial address space
layout, why it knows, because bios itself does the initial mapping for address
space.
In a non-bios enviornment, we can't get the memory map table by calling bios
service, so, we have to detect the siz
thanks,
but what did u mean write and verify,
I thhot grub depends heavilly on bios calls for all this ..
Alfred
On 5/10/05, coly li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> alfred hitch:
>
> It's not so easy to get the proper answer. it depends on your hardware. for
> I'm not familiar with embedded envi
alfred hitch:
It's not so easy to get the proper answer. it depends on your hardware. for I'm
not familiar with embedded enviornmnet, I can only give you some idea for x86
platform.
you should know your memory address space layouts. which range is for other
peripheral, which range is for real
21 matches
Mail list logo
