Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann writes:
>
>> to not lose current functionality, `print-exception' and exception
>> printer procedures would need a `frame' argument as well, right?
>
> I guess. I never liked that, though; sounds like a needless tangling of
> concer
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann writes:
>
>> [ It's off-topic in this thread, but I think the circular dependencies
>> introduced by using `@' and `@@' in the R6RS modules should at one
>> point be eliminated; they work almost all the time, but can fail in
>>
Ok I put the code in a repo of it's own.
So now this thingie is isolated.
I don't now what to do about the licesning, I kept
the COPYING as I should though.
To use it, store it in a %load-path directory
try
(use-modules (scsh syntax))
and then
(run (| (begin (pk 'wow) (pk 'vov)) (grep o)))
S
On Sun 28 Nov 2010 21:56, Noah Lavine writes:
> I've been poking around in the code, and noticed that procs.c has a
> reference to "applicable structs".
They aren't as efficient as they could be. Currently applicable structs
are the only nonuniform case in procedure calls -- I was trying to get
On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann writes:
> to not lose current functionality, `print-exception' and exception
> printer procedures would need a `frame' argument as well, right?
I guess. I never liked that, though; sounds like a needless tangling of
concerns. What does having the frame
On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann writes:
> [ It's off-topic in this thread, but I think the circular dependencies
> introduced by using `@' and `@@' in the R6RS modules should at one
> point be eliminated; they work almost all the time, but can fail in
> surprising ways -- see the
Hi Jao,
You can send it to me, that's fine. I'll put a repo on gitorious and
add that code there together with my suggested alternatives.
Regards
Stefan
On Monday, November 29, 2010 12:24:28 am Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29 2010, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> I
