l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
>>> something, no?
>>
>> The implementation they have (which they call a "demo") reimplements the
>> entire reader from
Hi,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
>> something, no?
>
> The implementation they have (which they call a "demo") reimplements the
> entire reader from scratch. There are several problems with t
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 16:38 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> > My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
> > something, no?
>
> The implementation they have (which they call a "demo") reimplements the
> entire reader from scratch. Ther
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
> something, no?
The implementation they have (which they call a "demo") reimplements the
entire reader from scratch. There are several problems with this, the
worst of which is that it stro
Hi!
My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
something, no?
And there as also this preliminary patch:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-03/msg00129.html
What about applying first, then one above, then anything beyond?
Ludo’.
source files.
* Globally, by evaluating: (read-enable 'curly-infix)
Reviews solicited.
Thanks,
Mark
>From 4102fbbd852d2f36e13f0c7f10dbac2017552bff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:09:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Implement SRFI-105 cu
nts and suggestions solicited,
Mark
>From 57a4ae1eb7f58103574525c7e727ff08d44f18ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:09:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Implement SRFI-105 curly infix expressions.
* libguile/private-options.h: Add SCM_CURLY_INFIX_P macro, a