On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:59:33 +0100
Markus Teich wrote:
> Grant Mathews wrote:
> > Aside from those points: would rewriting the patch to not use libnetpbm,
> > but to use the Netpbm helpers instead, be acceptable?
>
> Heyho Grant,
>
> no it will not, but as noted in the other mail you are welc
Heyho
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Xarchus wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:16:07AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:31:09AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
>> >> I realized that I am not dealin
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:16:07AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:31:09AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> >> I realized that I am not dealing with the case that the history file
> >> does not exist alre
commit 1c801ebeaacd92d08b0225dd7e8c8e7963aa59d8
Author: FRIGN
AuthorDate: Fri Dec 11 14:51:02 2015 +0100
Commit: FRIGN
CommitDate: Fri Dec 11 14:56:04 2015 +0100
Use stdin and stdout with 2ff
It always seemed odd to have a file-argument for 2ff, given all other
farbfeld
Nothing to do with mount. I'm working on a custom mounted partition.
root@ubuntu:~/stali/stalibuild# ls; pwd; mount | grep stali
src toolchain
/root/stali/stalibuild
/dev/sda1 on /root/stali type ext4 (rw,relatime,data=ordered)
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 12/11/15
On 12/11/15, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Harald Weber
> wrote:
>> "/bin/sh: 1: gen/maketab: not found"
>
> What is this? Is this a missing input file, output file (missing
> directory in between) or something that can't be executed because its
> shebang can't be interp
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Harald Weber wrote:
> "/bin/sh: 1: gen/maketab: not found"
What is this? Is this a missing input file, output file (missing
directory in between) or something that can't be executed because its
shebang can't be interpreted?
cheers!
mar77i
On 11 December 2015 at 12:30, Harald Weber wrote:
> Google sent me an email that someone tried to log into my account.
> That was immediately after the signup to the mailing list.
>
> I got the welcome email from the mailing list at: Thu, 10 Dec 2015
> 14:56:31 -0800 (PST)
>
> At Thursday, Decembe
I can execute the provided executable of yacc in bin/hbase/yacc.
If I change the config.mk to use the systems yacc i get the a similar
message as warning.
YACC = /usr/bin/yacc
Errors:
awkgram.y: warning: conflicts: 43 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
awkgram.y: warning: conflicts: 85 shift/
Hi
Google sent me an email that someone tried to log into my account.
That was immediately after the signup to the mailing list.
I got the welcome email from the mailing list at: Thu, 10 Dec 2015
14:56:31 -0800 (PST)
At Thursday, December 10, 2015 5:56 PM (Eastern Standard Time) I got
an email f
On 11 December 2015 at 12:20, Harald Weber wrote:
> Yes I installed build-essential, flex and bison on the current debian live cd.
> flex 2.5.39
> bison 3.0.2
Did you touch config.mk? It ought to use
YACC = $(ROOT)/bin/hbase/yacc/yacc
Can you check if hbase/yacc/yacc is working for you?
-Ansel
Yes I installed build-essential, flex and bison on the current debian live cd.
flex 2.5.39
bison 3.0.2
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> On 11 December 2015 at 00:20, Harald Weber wrote:
>> Yes I think "conflicts: 43 shift/reduce, 85 reduce/reduce" results
On 11 December 2015 at 00:03, Harald Weber wrote:
> I just subscribed to your mailing list and immediately got a warning
> of some login tries from the US. Maybe there are some bots in your
> mailing list?
I don't understand. From whom did you receive such a mail?
Can you forward including full h
Hi Harald,
On 11 December 2015 at 00:20, Harald Weber wrote:
> Yes I think "conflicts: 43 shift/reduce, 85 reduce/reduce" results in
> "/bin/sh: 1: gen/maketab: not found"
Did you install flex and/or bison?
-Anselm
Grant Mathews wrote:
> Aside from those points: would rewriting the patch to not use libnetpbm,
> but to use the Netpbm helpers instead, be acceptable?
Heyho Grant,
no it will not, but as noted in the other mail you are welcome to push your
patch to the wiki.
--Markus
Heyho Grant,
Grant Mathews wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 04:39:49PM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> > Netpbm is arguably almost more complex than BMP and not easy to handle.
>
> It's literally the top result when I search for the phrase "simplest image
> format".
So your world is limited by the first t
16 matches
Mail list logo