On 14 February 2016 at 02:00, wrote:
> commit a6dc051e3744ce5b14c54d2d246d3e8258207e76
> Author: FRIGN
> AuthorDate: Sun Feb 14 01:48:48 2016 +0100
> Commit: FRIGN
> CommitDate: Sun Feb 14 02:00:14 2016 +0100
>
> No need for usage()
>
> There are 2 arguments why -v and -h are br
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:51:00AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:47:30 +0100
> Markus Teich wrote:
>
> Hey Markus,
>
> > then we would have to assume users don't have *any* binary starting with a
> > `-`
> > that they might want to run after locking, but I can still live with tha
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:47:30AM +0100, Markus Teich wrote:
> Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:35:11AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> > > My considerations here were that it was quite arbitrary not to document
> > > -h,
> > > given we "allow" a command to be passed to slock as se
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:47:30 +0100
Markus Teich wrote:
Hey Markus,
> then we would have to assume users don't have *any* binary starting with a `-`
> that they might want to run after locking, but I can still live with that.
that was actually my consideration. Given -h is documented nowhere, it
Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:35:11AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> > My considerations here were that it was quite arbitrary not to document -h,
> > given we "allow" a command to be passed to slock as second + further
> > arguments. However, I respect your stances on this and wi
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:35:11AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:15:50 +0100
> Markus Teich wrote:
>
> Hey Markus,
>
> > I have to agree with Christoph here. People running off git can just use
> > the rev
> > id they are using. I don't get what you mean with the attack surface
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:15:50 +0100
Markus Teich wrote:
Hey Markus,
> I have to agree with Christoph here. People running off git can just use the
> rev
> id they are using. I don't get what you mean with the attack surface sentence.
it was a rather weak argument by me, but still a possibility.
Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:46:52 +0100 g...@suckless.org wrote:
> > 1) if you are running off git, -v will show the last stable
> >release, effectively making this option useless.
> >people running stable versions leave open an atta
Greetings.
On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:46:52 +0100 g...@suckless.org wrote:
> commit a6dc051e3744ce5b14c54d2d246d3e8258207e76
> Author: FRIGN
> AuthorDate: Sun Feb 14 01:48:48 2016 +0100
> Commit: FRIGN
> CommitDate: Sun Feb 14 02:00:14 2016 +0100
>
> No need for usage()
>
> The
commit a6dc051e3744ce5b14c54d2d246d3e8258207e76
Author: FRIGN
AuthorDate: Sun Feb 14 01:48:48 2016 +0100
Commit: FRIGN
CommitDate: Sun Feb 14 02:00:14 2016 +0100
No need for usage()
There are 2 arguments why -v and -h are broken:
1) if you are running off git, -
10 matches
Mail list logo