Re: bug? reqidel and pcre

Hi Willy and Hank, Le jeudi 25 novembre 2010 07:10:20, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > Cyril, Hank is right, there's a bug. Here's how I can reproduce it with > both 1.4.9 and 1.5-dev3: > > Config : > listen echo > bind:8000 > modehttp > option http-server-close >

host specific error messages

Hello guys, Is it possible to set host specific error files in the config? That is to server /etc/error/503.html for www.this.com but /etc/error/503_alter.html for www.that.com ? If so how? :) Both hosts are served by the same listen directive atm. Was looking at acls and hdr_beg(host) -i, bu

Re: IIS7 with IIRF, 403 - Forbidden: Access is denied after HAproxy

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:18:11PM +0800, Hanky Cheng(SingTao) wrote: > Hi All > > I have a question about HAproxy with IIS7 & IIRF. > > As before i running website on IIS7 & IIRF for URLrewrite. Before 1 mth i > using HAproxy for loading balance (backend is same server but difference > port).

Re: option httpchk and SSL

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:24:10PM -0500, John Marrett wrote: > Arthur, > > I believe that you will need to use stunnel in client mode to initiate > the ssl connections to the back end. You'll set up multiple instances, > presumably on the machine running haproxy, each confired to point to a >

Re: bug? reqidel and pcre

Hi guys, On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:30:38PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote: > Hi Hank, > > Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010 19:55:32, Hank A. Paulson a écrit : > > I have a possible bug, I have a backend I want strip all the X-* headers > > off the requests. But I found that if I did: > > > > reqidel ^X >

Re: Session Definition

Hi Richard, On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:17:31PM +, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Hi, > > Could someone please give me the correct definition of a session under > HAProxy, i've confused myself! A session is the entity instanciated when an incoming connection is accepted. Until recently, it could o

Re: [SOLVED] Re: appsession does not work in Haproxy 1.4.9

Hi Willy, you are awesome! I am trying it now and give you feedback. Thanks! Hogan On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Hogan, > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:33:37PM +0800, Hogan Yu wrote: > > Hi Willy, > > I send you an dump core file and I sure that we have some fre

Re: option httpchk and SSL

Arthur, I believe that you will need to use stunnel in client mode to initiate the ssl connections to the back end. You'll set up multiple instances, presumably on the machine running haproxy, each confired to point to a specific backend. httpchk will not do https. -JohnF

option httpchk and SSL

Hi, I am running haproxy 1.3.2 as a load balancer for some servers running nginx as an ssl terminator which forwards to squid running as a reverse proxy which falls back to apache. I want to use 'option httpchk' to check whether or not a specific resource is available to our users - the idea

Re: [PATCH] bind non local ip on FreeBSD

2010/11/24 Willy Tarreau : > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:28:26PM +0300, Alexandre Snarskii wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:03:42PM +0100, joris dedieu wrote: >> > Hi list, >> > FreeBSD (and maybe other BSD) use IP_BINDANY flag to permite bind() to >> > bind a non local ip >> >> Please note that

Re: bug? reqidel and pcre

Hi Hank, Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010 19:55:32, Hank A. Paulson a écrit : > I have a possible bug, I have a backend I want strip all the X-* headers > off the requests. But I found that if I did: > > reqidel ^X > reqidel ^Via:\ > > or > > reqdel ^x-.*:\ > reqdel ^Via > > or similar > > haprox

bug? reqidel and pcre

I have a possible bug, I have a backend I want strip all the X-* headers off the requests. But I found that if I did: reqidel ^X reqidel ^Via:\ or reqdel ^x-.*:\ reqdel ^Via or similar haproxy [1.4.8 (Fedora package version) and hand compiled 1.4.9 version both using pcre] both would not re

[SOLVED] Re: appsession does not work in Haproxy 1.4.9

Hi Hogan, On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:33:37PM +0800, Hogan Yu wrote: > Hi Willy, > I send you an dump core file and I sure that we have some free memory on > our platform. Thank you very much for your core. I could find the issue and indeed it's not related to a memory shortage, which was the iss

Session Definition

Hi, Could someone please give me the correct definition of a session under HAProxy, i've confused myself! Thanks Richard

Re: Meta backend ?

> Currently there is no "meta backend" functionality, so you need to duplicate > your config manually or to write a script that generates it in a desired > way. Regarding your concerns related to health checks performance, you can > and even should use "track backend/server" option: > > http://hapr

Re: Meta backend ?

On 2010-11-18 16:57, Bartłomiej Jarocki wrote: Hi, Hello Bartłomiej, I'm using haproxy for few years on quite big environments so I'd like to say 'BIG THANKS' before asking a question :-) simple scenario: backend www1 [ few hundreds of servers ] backend www2 [ few hundreds

Re: appsession does not work in Haproxy 1.4.9

Hi Willy, I send you an dump core file and I sure that we have some free memory on our platform. # free -m total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 16046 15919127 0365 1729 -/+ buffers/cache: 13824

Re: appsession does not work in Haproxy 1.4.9

Hi Hogan, On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 03:32:14PM +0800, Hogan Yu wrote: > Hi Willy, > > Sorry for give your feedback late. I test it several days and it does not > work with the new two patchs. It hang two times one day. > It still get the errors as follows, > haproxy[8728]: segfault at 1e