Hi,
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:50:07AM +0200, Maik Broemme wrote:
>
> I don't get you. You mean that simply omitting the "if" between "reject" and
> "cond" is not returned as an error, that's it ? If so, yes I agree that it
> would be better that it yells here. Since I cop
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:50:07AM +0200, Maik Broemme wrote:
> > The second case above was precisely what led me to discover the segfault
> > bug, which was introduced in 1.3.17 with the refinement of the config
> > warnings. But the behaviour has not changed since 1.3.16.
> >
>
> You have misse
Hi,
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Maik,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:36:46AM +0200, Maik Broemme wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > attached is a patch which fixes a configuration mistake regarding the
> > 'tcp-request' option. If you have the following in your configuration
> > file:
> >
> > acl
Hi Maik,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:36:46AM +0200, Maik Broemme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a patch which fixes a configuration mistake regarding the
> 'tcp-request' option. If you have the following in your configuration
> file:
>
> acl localnet dst 10.0.0.0/8
> tcp-req
Hi,
attached is a patch which fixes a configuration mistake regarding the
'tcp-request' option. If you have the following in your configuration
file:
acl localnet dst 10.0.0.0/8
tcp-request content reject if localnet
This will work fine, but if you change the 'tcp
5 matches
Mail list logo