please check my sites

*Hello * *I am a professional Link builder. I am providing guest posting services. I have many blogs in different niches. I am sending you some blogs. If you interested* URL DA Monthly Visits Alexa rank https://lifehacker.com/

Re: please check

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:55:35AM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > Works beautifully. I had created a little test suite to test to test a > bunch of conditions around this, and they all pass. Wow, impressed with the speed of your test! Thanks! > Will see about throwing this in our development envi

Re: please check

*From: *Willy Tarreau *Sent: * 2014-05-07 09:45:47 E *To: *Patrick Hemmer , Rachel Chavez *CC: *haproxy@formilux.org *Subject: *Re: please check > Hi Patrick, hi Rachel, > > so with these two patches applied on t

Re: please check

Hi Patrick, hi Rachel, so with these two patches applied on top of the previous one, I get the behaviour that we discussed here. Specifically, we differentiate client-read timeout, server-write timeouts and server read timeouts during the data forwarding phase. Also, we disable server read timeou

Re: please check

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:30:43AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > The strange news: Contrary to your statement, the client connection is > > closed after the 1 second timeout. It even logs this. The only thing > > that doesn't happen properly is the absence of any response. Just > > immediate conn

Re: please check

Hi Patrick, On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:38:04PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > *From: *Willy Tarreau > *Sent: * 2014-05-06 17:41:18 E > *To: *Patrick Hemmer , Rachel Chavez > > *CC: *haproxy@formilux.org > *Subject: *Re: please check > > > Hi Patrick, hi Rachel, >

Re: please check

*From: *Willy Tarreau *Sent: * 2014-05-06 17:41:18 E *To: *Patrick Hemmer , Rachel Chavez *CC: *haproxy@formilux.org *Subject: *Re: please check > Hi Patrick, hi Rachel, > > I might have fixed half of the issue, I'd like you to test the attached patch. > It ensures that the cl

Re: please check

Hi Patrick, hi Rachel, I might have fixed half of the issue, I'd like you to test the attached patch. It ensures that the client-side timeout is only disabled after transmitting the whole body and not during the transmission. It will report "cD" in the flags, but does not affect the status code ye

Re: please check

Hi Patrick, > > >> With incomplete headers I get: > > >> haproxy[8893]: 127.0.0.1:41438 [02/May/2014:14:11:26.373] f1 f1/ > > >> -1/-1/-1/-1/1001 408 212 - - cR-- 0/0/0/0/0 0/0 "" > > >> > > >> With no body I get: > > >> haproxy[8893]: 127.0.0.1:41439 [02/May/2014:14:11:29.576] f1 b1/s1 > > >> 0/0

Re: please check

ilux.org > *Subject: *Re: please check > > > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:14:41PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > >> *From: *Willy Tarreau > >> *Sent: * 2014-05-02 14:00:24 E > >> *To: *Patrick Hemmer > >> *CC: *Rachel Chavez , haproxy@formilux.org > &

Re: please check

*From: *Willy Tarreau *Sent: * 2014-05-02 15:06:13 E *To: *Patrick Hemmer *CC: *Rachel Chavez , haproxy@formilux.org *Subject: *Re: please check > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:14:41PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wr

Re: please check

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:14:41PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > *From: *Willy Tarreau > *Sent: * 2014-05-02 14:00:24 E > *To: *Patrick Hemmer > *CC: *Rachel Chavez , haproxy@formilux.org > *Subject: *Re: please check > > > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 01:32:30PM -04

Re: please check

*From: *Willy Tarreau *Sent: * 2014-05-02 14:00:24 E *To: *Patrick Hemmer *CC: *Rachel Chavez , haproxy@formilux.org *Subject: *Re: please check > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 01:32:30PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: >> I've set up a test scenario, and the only time haproxy responds wit

Re: please check

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 01:32:30PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > >> This only applies if the "Expect: 100-continue" was sent. "Expect: > >> 100-continue" was meant to solve the issue where the client has a large > >> body, and wants to make sure that the server will accept the body before > >> sen

Re: please check

*From: *Willy Tarreau *Sent: * 2014-05-02 12:56:16 E *To: *Patrick Hemmer *CC: *Rachel Chavez , haproxy@formilux.org *Subject: *Re: please check > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:18:43PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: >>>> At any moment the server is free to respond yes, but th

Re: please check

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:18:43PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > >> At any moment the server is free to respond yes, but the server cannot > >> respond *properly* until it gets the complete request. > > Yes it can, redirects are the most common anticipated response, as the > > result of a POST to

Re: please check

*From: *Willy Tarreau *Sent: * 2014-05-02 11:15:07 E *To: *Patrick Hemmer *CC: *Rachel Chavez , haproxy@formilux.org *Subject: *Re: please check > Hi Patrick, > > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:57:38AM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: >> *From: *Willy Tarreau >> *Sent: * 2014-05

Re: please check

Hi Patrick, On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:57:38AM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote: > *From: *Willy Tarreau > *Sent: * 2014-05-02 02:02:11 E > *To: *Rachel Chavez > *CC: *haproxy@formilux.org > *Subject: *Re: please check > > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 03:44:46PM -0400, Rache

Re: please check

*From: *Willy Tarreau *Sent: * 2014-05-02 02:02:11 E *To: *Rachel Chavez *CC: *haproxy@formilux.org *Subject: *Re: please check > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 03:44:46PM -0400, Rachel Chavez wrote: >> The problem is: >> >> when client sends a request with incomplete body (it h

Re: please check

On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 03:44:46PM -0400, Rachel Chavez wrote: > The problem is: > > when client sends a request with incomplete body (it has content-length but > no body) then haproxy returns a 5XX error when it should be a client issue. It's a bit more complicated than that. When the request bo

Re: please check

The problem is: when client sends a request with incomplete body (it has content-length but no body) then haproxy returns a 5XX error when it should be a client issue. In the session.c file starting in 2404 i make sure that if I haven't received the entire body of the request I continue to wait f

Re: please check

Hi, On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:56:01AM -0400, Rachel Chavez wrote: > Could someone please tell me if what I did is right? > I posted this fix a while ago and I didn't get a response. > > http://marc.info/?l=haproxy&m=139506908430417&w=2 > > Thank you in advance, Could you please first describe

please check

Could someone please tell me if what I did is right? I posted this fix a while ago and I didn't get a response. http://marc.info/?l=haproxy&m=139506908430417&w=2 Thank you in advance, -- Rachel Chavez