--- Mark Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, David Bergman wrote:
> (snip)
> > Till then, we "Haskellers" will probably continue expressing our
> > patterns either directly in Haskell or using highly formal language,
> > with terms such as "catamorphisms".
> >
> > The virtue,
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, David Bergman wrote:
(snip)
> Till then, we "Haskellers" will probably continue expressing our
> patterns either directly in Haskell or using highly formal language,
> with terms such as "catamorphisms".
>
> The virtue, and weakness, of traditional design patterns is their
> vag
At 2002-12-02 00:37, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>Main things in the next major release are
> mdo
> Template Haskell
Can mdo be done in TH? It would be nice if there were some kind of macro
system for this sort of thing; I know there's also a syntax for Arrows
that requires a preproce
| For the moment I've chosen to do the mdo desugaring manually instead
| of moving to the CVS ghc (or exclusively using Hugs.) Will mdo be in
| the next release? (That's 5.04.2, I think -- though I've recently
| been confused about GHC releases.) The relevant revision to Lex.lhs
| is pretty rec
