Chris Samuel, le Fri 30 Oct 2009 16:50:25 +1100, a écrit :
> It doesn't build with PGI v8.0 though..
Could you try the svn
https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/hwloc/branches/v0.9
?
Samuel
Chris Samuel, le Fri 30 Oct 2009 16:50:25 +1100, a écrit :
> PGC-S-0043-Redefinition of symbol, nbobjs (topology.c: 77)
Arf.
I'll commit something to circumvent it.
Samuel
- "Pavan Balaji" wrote:
> Log files attached.
Hmm, it compiled for me with pgcc!
[csamuel@tango hwloc-0.9.1rc3]$ pgcc -V
pgcc 9.0-4 64-bit target on x86-64 Linux -tp shanghai-64
Copyright 1989-2000, The Portland Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2000-2009, STMicroelectronics, In
On 10/29/2009 06:01 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> In the meanwhile, I have commited detection code, could you check the
> svn version from
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/hwloc/branches/v0.9
> ?
Yeah, this seems to build fine. Thanks.
-- Pavan
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
Pavan Balaji, le Thu 29 Oct 2009 16:14:23 -0500, a écrit :
> /*
> * Copyright 2009, STMicroelectronics, Incorporated.
> * All rights reserved.
> */
>
> /*
> Enable the __CPU definitons hidden by __USE_GNU
> */
> #include_next
>
> /* Access macros for `cpu_set'. */
> #define CPU_
Brice Goglin, le Thu 29 Oct 2009 23:40:07 +0100, a écrit :
> Pavan Balaji wrote:
> > This is the latest version of the PGI compiler. If this is indeed
> > broken, then it'll be ideal if the configure can detect it and basically
> > disable everything. That is, hwloc_topology_init can return a failu
Pavan Balaji wrote:
> This is the latest version of the PGI compiler. If this is indeed
> broken, then it'll be ideal if the configure can detect it and basically
> disable everything. That is, hwloc_topology_init can return a failure,
> so packages relying on hwloc can do something else.
>
We
This is the latest version of the PGI compiler. If this is indeed
broken, then it'll be ideal if the configure can detect it and basically
disable everything. That is, hwloc_topology_init can return a failure,
so packages relying on hwloc can do something else.
FWIW, I don't have this problem wit
Do we support broken compilers ? :)
Is this pgcc old? Is it supposed to work with a recent glibc that
defines CPU* using __CPU*_S instead of using __CPU*? I don't know what
they're doing, but the macros in this file look obsolete to me...
Brice
Attached.
On 10/29/2009 04:12 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> What's in
> /radix-homes/software/com/packages/pgi-9.0-4/linux86-64/9.0-4/include/sched.h
> ?
>
> Brice
>
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
/*
* Copyright 2009, STMicroelectronics, Incorporated.
* All rights rese
What's in
/radix-homes/software/com/packages/pgi-9.0-4/linux86-64/9.0-4/include/sched.h
?
Brice
11 matches
Mail list logo