2017-09-16 7:42 GMT-05:00 Walter Bender :
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Laura Vargas
> wrote:
>
>> Walter,
>>
>> I guess my question was not clear. My question is about the procedure to
>> address legal issues to Conservancy.
>>
>> The
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:56 PM, Laura Vargas
wrote:
> Walter,
>
> I guess my question was not clear. My question is about the procedure to
> address legal issues to Conservancy.
>
> The procedure you (SLOB) follow the first time you want to address
> Conservancy was to
Walter,
I guess my question was not clear. My question is about the procedure to
address legal issues to Conservancy.
The procedure you (SLOB) follow the first time you want to address
Conservancy was to just ask Adam (Sugar Labs rep to SFC) to make a question
to Tony.
The procedure you (SLOB)
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Laura Vargas wrote:
> Walter, Adam,
>
> Am confused here. Why did we not need a motion to make the question to
> Tony in the first place?
>
> Can you please clarify.
>
Tony asked for the opinion of the oversight board to several
> On 15 Sep 2017, at 14:13, Lionel Laské wrote:
>
>
> +1 for the motion.
>
> @Martin, thanks to wait for all votes or at least the end of voting delay.
Sure Lionel - what is the voting delay? I actually was waiting but the wiki had
been updated already (not by me) so
Hello all,
It is more than 24hrs since walter requested this motion should be
seconded, so that voting can begin.
Sorry for thinking this way, but is it that the community don't want to
support the Bordeaux trip at all?
This is the second time i am making a proposal. First, was for me and Ibiam
Okay, i heard you.
I think me replying to some statements will create more discussion, so i
wouldn't.
Could it be seconded, as walter suggested so that it could be voted upon?
SG
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> If board members cannot feed themselves in
If board members cannot feed themselves in their own country, and
additionally Sugar Labs is being asked to create my-favorite-hotel in
my-favorite-neighborhood welfare handouts for its own board members in
their own countries, we have a far deeper long-term problem on our hands
here, that will
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2017 8:37 AM, "Walter Bender" wrote:
>
> Please excuse the top post.
>
> I'd like to bring some clarity to the discussion of this motion. As most
> of you know, Sugar Labs is a member project
On Jun 3, 2017 8:37 AM, "Walter Bender" wrote:
Please excuse the top post.
I'd like to bring some clarity to the discussion of this motion. As most of
you know, Sugar Labs is a member project of the Software Freedom
Conservancy. The Conservancy has well-established
Please excuse the top post.
I'd like to bring some clarity to the discussion of this motion. As most of
you know, Sugar Labs is a member project of the Software Freedom
Conservancy. The Conservancy has well-established guidelines for travel,
and the travel plans in the proposal accompanying the
11 matches
Mail list logo