In
,
on 11/11/2010
at 12:28 PM, Martin Packer said:
>Do others agree? Or is this a very minor "nice to have"?
Nice to have. OTOH, if they added metadata to allow accurate progress
reports on unterse, that would be very nice.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO posit
On 11 November 2010 19:27, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> If it's a PDS, does AMATERSE unpack to another temp file, then
> point IEBCOPY at that?
As far as I can see AMATERSE has its own method of unloading PDS[E]s.
Tony H.
--
For IB
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:28:42 +, Martin Packer wrote:
>When I receive data from a customer I pull it using FTP - and I get a line
>in the SYSOUT every so often, as well as an early file size line to
>compare against. My next step is to unterse it. I think it would be useful
>to have a similar p
On 11 November 2010 07:28, Martin Packer wrote:
> When I receive data from a customer I pull it using FTP - and I get a line
> in the SYSOUT every so often, as well as an early file size line to
> compare against. My next step is to unterse it. I think it would be useful
> to have a similar progre
When I receive data from a customer I pull it using FTP - and I get a line
in the SYSOUT every so often, as well as an early file size line to
compare against. My next step is to unterse it. I think it would be useful
to have a similar progress indicator.
Do others agree? Or is this a very mino
5 matches
Mail list logo
