Re: Attachements (Was IRREVX01 strangeness)

2008-04-16 Thread Darren Evans-Young
Text attachments are allowed. Non-text attachments will be rejected. Darren On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Eric Bielefeld wrote: >Since when has IBM-Main allowed attachements. This is the first time I've >ever seen one. > >Eric -- For

Re: Attachements (Was IRREVX01 strangeness)

2008-04-16 Thread Wayne Driscoll
Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 11:40 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Attachements (Was IRREVX01 strangeness) Since when has IBM-Main allowed attachements. This is the first time I've

Re: Attachements (Was IRREVX01 strangeness)

2008-04-16 Thread Eric Bielefeld
Thanks Tom. I am actually posting from the web page this time, and I see the place for attachments. I used to use the web page all the time, after P&H Mining said I was getting too many emails. I found it hard to use, as it sometimes was hard to find my place the next day. Now I read most

Re: Attachements (Was IRREVX01 strangeness)

2008-04-16 Thread Tom Schmidt
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:40:12 -0500, Eric Bielefeld wrote: >Since when has IBM-Main allowed attachements. This is the first time I've ever seen one. Eric, The ibm-main LISTSERV web interface (which many of us use) has allowed attachments for quite some time now. I don't believe this rece

Re: Attachements (Was IRREVX01 strangeness)

2008-04-16 Thread Eric Bielefeld
Since when has IBM-Main allowed attachements. This is the first time I've ever seen one. Eric Paul Whelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, >SNIP> > The code is based on the samples in SYS1.SAMPLIB(RACEXITS) and is attached. > > Best regards > Paul Whelan -- Eric Bielefeld Syste