Wow! That one goes in my bookmarks!
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* Beware of any Christian leader who does not walk with a limp. -Bob Mumford
*/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
allan winston
Sent: Thursday, October
Ed, Johnathan;
You guys are *so *lucky.
A few quick notes to get you started:
- Unlike Unix piping, terminal output from the last stage is not
implied. (You'll find this makes sense later.)
pipe < some.dsn | count words lines | term
- The <, >, and >> are filters on their own, also
Ed,
I stand corrected. Thanks for the link to https://ibmdocs.pocnet.net/,
which I was previously unaware of.
About a week ago, I was looking for BatchPipes manuals and had only
found the main reference manual. Now
I have added the other manuals to my collection.
Allan
On Thu,
I would've said Shmegoogle (a takeoff on Shmegheggi)
On 2021-10-21 12:34, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 10/21/2021 9:16 AM, allan winston wrote:
When I Google "TSO PIPE", I found that it is a command within Netview.
BatchPipes is a completely different program product.
Google Schmoogle...
The message
On 10/21/2021 9:16 AM, allan winston wrote:
When I Google "TSO PIPE", I found that it is a command within Netview.
BatchPipes is a completely different program product.
Google Schmoogle...
The message id shown in my example (BPW00256I) is documented in Appendix
C of IBM BatchPipes OS/390
When I Google "TSO PIPE", I found that it is a command within Netview.
BatchPipes is a completely different program product.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:59 AM Ed Jaffe
wrote:
> On 10/21/2021 8:18 AM, Nash, Jonathan S. wrote:
> > ... I just tried TSO PIPE and it worked
>
> READY
> pipe
>
On 10/21/2021 8:18 AM, Nash, Jonathan S. wrote:
... I just tried TSO PIPE and it worked
READY
pipe
BPW00256I Enter a pipeline specification
READY
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
Of
Nash, Jonathan S.
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 10:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Mainframe Modernization
** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
Some goverment agencies are replacing
their mainframe COBOL with java.
I dont see a payoff. I think this
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Mainframe Modernization
What kind of "lies- smoke and mirrors" do you see that IBM should be
pushing back on with our marketing?
I'm just a highly technical crypto guy, so I don't write the marketing
copy, but you have piqued my interest.
Eric Rossman, CIS
