Re: Last Call: (Datagram Transport Layer Security version 1.2) to Proposed Standard

2010-12-20 Thread Pekka Savola
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, The IESG wrote: The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG (tls) to consider the following document: - 'Datagram Transport Layer Security version 1.2' as a Proposed Standard A bit late to the IETF LC, but hopefully these are still useful. This i

Re: Last Call: (Datagram Transport Layer Security version 1.2) to Proposed Standard

2010-12-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Pekka Savola: >If there is a transport protocol indication (either via ICMP or via a >refusal to send the datagram as in DCCP Section 14), then DTLS record >layer should inform the upper layer protocol of the error. > > .. is this too weak? I've have thought that it would be natural

Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-trill

2010-12-20 Thread Radia Perlman
No objections. Radia On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote: > My apologies for responding slowly, I was traveling. > > If it is tolerable to people, I do not mind adding the two sentences > requested by Sam to the isis-trill draft. > > Thanks, > Donald > > PS: It appears to me

Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-trill

2010-12-20 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Radia" == Radia Perlman writes: Radia> No objections. Radia Can I get someone to confirm that the text in the proposed sentences is substantially true? I think so but I'm not an IS-IS expert. ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www

Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-roll-routing-metrics-14

2010-12-20 Thread Roni Even
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-roll-routing-metrics-14

Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-trill

2010-12-20 Thread Donald Eastlake
Hi, On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: >> "Radia" == Radia Perlman writes: > >    Radia> No objections.  Radia > > > Can I get someone to confirm that the text in the proposed sentences is > substantially true? > I think so but I'm not an IS-IS expert. LSPs have sequences

Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-trill

2010-12-20 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Donald" == Donald Eastlake writes: Donald> Hi, Donald> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: >>> "Radia" == Radia Perlman writes: >> >>    Radia> No objections.  Radia >> >> >> Can I get someone to confirm that the text in the propos

Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-trill

2010-12-20 Thread Stewart Bryant
On 20/12/2010 18:43, Donald Eastlake wrote: Hi, On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: "Radia" == Radia Perlman writes: Radia> No objections. Radia Can I get someone to confirm that the text in the proposed sentences is substantially true? I think so but I'm not an IS-I

Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-trill

2010-12-20 Thread Donald Eastlake
Hi, On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > On 20/12/2010 18:43, Donald Eastlake wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Sam Hartman >>  wrote: "Radia" == Radia Perlman  writes: >>> >>>    Radia>  No objections.  Radia >>> >>> Can I get someone to confir