> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12p2. This
> release should be considered production quality.
>
> I was careless in applying the memory corruption patch in 2.3.12p1 and
> it didn't actually solve the problem. It should be fixed now.
Ken, I can't see any difference betwe
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12p2. This
release should be considered production quality.
I was careless in applying the memory corruption patch in 2.3.12p1 and
it didn't actually solve the problem. It should be fixed now.
Noteworthy changes from 2.3.11:
* Added stat
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12p1. This
release should be considered production quality.
The only change from 2.3.12 is a patch to fix a memory corruption in the
imapd.conf parsing code which could cause segfaults on certain platforms.
Noteworthy changes from 2.3.11:
> Simon Matter wrote:
>>> Simon Matter wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12. This
> release should be considered production quality.
>
>
> Noteworthy changes:
>
> * Added statuscache.db to cache IMAP STATUS data which
> significantly r
Simon Matter wrote:
>> Simon Matter wrote:
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12. This
release should be considered production quality.
Noteworthy changes:
* Added statuscache.db to cache IMAP STATUS data which
significantly reduces the
> Simon Matter wrote:
>>> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12. This
>>> release should be considered production quality.
>>>
>>>
>>> Noteworthy changes:
>>>
>>> * Added statuscache.db to cache IMAP STATUS data which
>>> significantly reduces the amount of I/O necessary when
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am not sure how happy I am too find out about cyrus.
> >
> > I just spent a lot of time getting everythig working on my first
> > server...and even sendmail was not too hard (centos 5 sets it up rather
> > well)...
>
Simon Matter wrote:
>> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12. This
>> release should be considered production quality.
>>
>>
>> Noteworthy changes:
>>
>> * Added statuscache.db to cache IMAP STATUS data which
>> significantly reduces the amount of I/O necessary when neither th
> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12. This
> release should be considered production quality.
>
>
> Noteworthy changes:
>
> * Added statuscache.db to cache IMAP STATUS data which
> significantly reduces the amount of I/O necessary when neither the
> mailbox nor \Seen state
> Simon Matter schrieb:
>>> Did you copy/paste the patch? Then maybe it's a problem with whitespace
>>> and such. Can you try the attached one.
>
> Yes I did c/p and that seems to be the problem, because with your
> patch it did that:
>
>> imap-1:/export/build/cyrus-imapd-2.3.12# patch -p1 <
>> ../
Simon Matter schrieb:
>> Did you copy/paste the patch? Then maybe it's a problem with whitespace
>> and such. Can you try the attached one.
Yes I did c/p and that seems to be the problem, because with your
patch it did that:
> imap-1:/export/build/cyrus-imapd-2.3.12# patch -p1 <
> ../cyrus-imapd
> Simon Matter schrieb:
>>> They don't apply togheter, only one can be applied. Try with fresh
>>> sources
>>> and Andy Fiddaman's patch should apply fine.
>>>
>>> Simon
>
> I should have mentioned that that I did it with fresh sources.
>
> 1. fresh sources with first patch
> 2. delete source tree
Simon Matter schrieb:
>> They don't apply togheter, only one can be applied. Try with fresh sources
>> and Andy Fiddaman's patch should apply fine.
>>
>> Simon
I should have mentioned that that I did it with fresh sources.
1. fresh sources with first patch
2. delete source tree
3. unpack sources
> Andy Fiddaman schrieb:
>>> That's the line that the patch changes, and that's the old version of
>>> the
>>> line, so something didn't take with your patching.
>>>
>>> A.
>
> It seems so, but I don't understand, why. Here's the patch:
>
>> --- cyrus-imapd-2.3.12/lib/libconfig.c 2008/04/11 20:07:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:58:05AM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Have you looked at:
>
> http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/patches/cyrus-auditlog-2.3.11.diff
>
> It's a very detailed logging system which logs all create, delete,
> append, copy, expunge, unlink, etc events. Anything which changes
>
Andy Fiddaman schrieb:
>> That's the line that the patch changes, and that's the old version of the
>> line, so something didn't take with your patching.
>>
>> A.
It seems so, but I don't understand, why. Here's the patch:
> --- cyrus-imapd-2.3.12/lib/libconfig.c 2008/04/11 20:07:00 1.18
>
--On 24. April 2008 09:06:33 +0200 Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Holy moly.
Looking for cyrus on machine was interesting as almost all of the files
would not come up with a 'locate' command. And still do not. I am
manually going through all the doc folders and etc and sys folders sin
> I am not sure how happy I am too find out about cyrus.
>
> I just spent a lot of time getting everythig working on my first
> server...and even sendmail was not too hard (centos 5 sets it up rather
> well)...
>
> Then I see I needed a pop3 doo hickey..
>
> Holy moly.
>
> Looking for cyrus on mach
Hi!
Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> + copyargs->name, index_getheader(mailbox, msgno,
>> "X-DSPAM-Signature"));
>
> Wow - that's pretty tricky. I see you're actually logging a specific
> header as well. Funky. We don't have anything like that in our
yes.
> I'd still suggest that this should b
19 matches
Mail list logo
