Hi,
due to instability of the current code, we need to postpone second alpha to
next week.
Maintainers:
- please ensure that all packages you maintain builds in jenkins
- please ensure that all the dependencies required by your packages are
available either in ovirt repository or in an external r
Le mardi 16 juin 2015 à 03:38 -0400, Eyal Edri a écrit :
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Karsten Wade"
> > To: infra@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 6:29:04 AM
> > Subject: Re: migration of services from linode server to phx2 lab
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 06/16, Eyal Edri wrote:
> Sounds like a bug.
> Jenkins should only use the CI flag and not change CR and V flags.
>
> Might have been a misunderstanding.
> David, can you fix it so Jenkins will only update CI flag?
Can someone pass me an example of the patch that had the reviews? It's possible
Sounds like a bug.
Jenkins should only use the CI flag and not change CR and V flags.
Might have been a misunderstanding.
David, can you fix it so Jenkins will only update CI flag?
E.
Eyal Edri
Supervisor, RHEV CI
Red Hat
From: Dan Kenigsberg
Sent: Jun 16, 2015 7:06 PM
To: infra@ovirt.org
Cc: e
As of yesterday, Jenkins CI starting granting CR+1, V+1 and CI+1 for
every patchset that it successfully passed.
Was this change somehow intentional?
It is confusing and unwanted. Only a human developer can give a
meaningful Code-Review. Only a human user/QE can say that a patch solved
the releva
- Original Message -
> From: "Michal Skrivanek"
> To: "Eyal Edri"
> Cc: "infra"
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 4:03:11 PM
> Subject: Re: findbugs fails with no reason
>
>
> On Jun 16, 2015, at 14:48 , Eyal Edri wrote:
>
> > ok,
> > the job fails due to network error / accessing mav
On Jun 16, 2015, at 14:48 , Eyal Edri wrote:
> ok,
> the job fails due to network error / accessing maven repo (not related to
> findbugs):
>
> 13:06:28 [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jun 16 12:06:27 UTC 2015
> 13:06:29 [INFO] Final Memory: 293M/851M
> 13:06:29 [INFO]
> -
ok,
the job fails due to network error / accessing maven repo (not related to
findbugs):
13:06:28 [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jun 16 12:06:27 UTC 2015
13:06:29 [INFO] Final Memory: 293M/851M
13:06:29 [INFO]
13:06:29 [ERROR] Err
- Original Message -
> From: "Eyal Edri"
> To: "Omer Frenkel"
> Cc: "infra"
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 3:35:15 PM
> Subject: Re: findbugs fails with no reason
>
> the findbugs yells on vdsdeploy file, and the patch did alter that file,
> so if you believe that's false positive, yo
the findbugs yells on vdsdeploy file, and the patch did alter that file,
so if you believe that's false positive, you will need to update the xml filter
file
to ignore it.
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-engine_master_find-bugs_gerrit/39057/findbugsResult/
VdsDeploy.java:720, DLS_DEAD_LOCAL_S
can someone please check
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/42422/
Thanks
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
Il 16/06/2015 13:27, Piotr Kliczewski ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
> wrote:
>> Il 16/06/2015 09:53, Piotr Kliczewski ha scritto:
>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
thanks for the quick action on this,
any idea why it was stuck? we
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il 16/06/2015 09:53, Piotr Kliczewski ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>>> thanks for the quick action on this,
>>> any idea why it was stuck? we solved the mom issues yesterday by updating
>>> the mock
>
We are pending a major rebuild of all the slaves, the new ones should have 40G
disks, that would solve it, but that's been planned for so long that I'm not
sure it's something worth waiting for if it's blocking you.
Adding a tag to some slaves that 'should' have more space is something that
will
- Original Message -
>
> The requirements have changed or something?
No, the requirements did not change.
But as discussed previously, the build process involves several images (because
they need to be converted from qcow2 to ova), and this can require a lot of
space.
We are currently
The requirements have changed or something?
In the cleanup I see that the slave has 13GB free prior to starting to do
anything (as usual)
10:40:09 /dev/vda318G 4.6G 13G 28% /
On 06/16, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-appliance-engine_3.5_merged/66/consol
- Original Message -
> looking at the slave it has 12G free:
>
> [eedri@fc20-vm06 ~]$ df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/vda318G 4.9G 12G 30% /
> devtmpfs4.4G 0 4.4G 0% /dev
> tmpfs 4.4G 0 4.4G 0% /dev/shm
> tmpfs
looking at the slave it has 12G free:
[eedri@fc20-vm06 ~]$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/vda318G 4.9G 12G 30% /
devtmpfs4.4G 0 4.4G 0% /dev
tmpfs 4.4G 0 4.4G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 4.4G 368K 4.4G 1% /run
tmpfs
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-appliance-engine_3.5_merged/66/console
15:05:33 Max needed: 9.8G. Free: 9.0G. May need another 748.2M.
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
__
Il 16/06/2015 09:53, Piotr Kliczewski ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>> thanks for the quick action on this,
>> any idea why it was stuck? we solved the mom issues yesterday by updating
>> the mock
>> repos to take latest mom from master snapshot repo.
>>
>> s.
>>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> thanks for the quick action on this,
> any idea why it was stuck? we solved the mom issues yesterday by updating the
> mock
> repos to take latest mom from master snapshot repo.
>
> s.
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Sandro Bonazzola"
### Logwatch 7.3.6 (05/19/07)
Processing Initiated: Tue Jun 16 03:46:26 2015
Date Range Processed: yesterday
( 2015-Jun-15 )
Period is day.
Detail Level of Output: 0
- Original Message -
> From: "Karsten Wade"
> To: infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 6:29:04 AM
> Subject: Re: migration of services from linode server to phx2 lab
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Between myself (original linode01.ovirt.org a
thanks for the quick action on this,
any idea why it was stuck? we solved the mom issues yesterday by updating the
mock
repos to take latest mom from master snapshot repo.
s.
- Original Message -
> From: "Sandro Bonazzola"
> To: de...@ovirt.org, "infra"
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 9
24 matches
Mail list logo
