On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:16:32PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:22:11AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:5
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:57:16AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:22:11AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:57
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:38:15PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:26:59PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > This patch includes an unconditional clflush for phys writes (or at
> > least this patch should be that patch) which is what I thought we were
> > arguing about at the
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:26:59PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:16:32PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:22:11AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:20
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:16:32PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:22:11AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:5
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:22:11AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:5
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:22:11AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:5
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:22:11AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:51:38AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > > Patch drm/i915: Make the
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:51:38AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > Patch drm/i915: Make the physical object coherent with GTT - Reviewer:
> >
> > Already has my
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:57:29AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:51:38AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Patch drm/i915: Make the physical object coherent with GTT - Reviewer:
>
> Already has my r-b.
I still would like to see a little testcase here, e.g. a new mode t
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:51:38AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>
> This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector
>
> Here goes the update list in order for better reviewers assignment:
>
> Patch drm/i915: Check
Just a warning that this round collector had many differences on PRTS:
HSw:
Testing: http://tinderbox.sh.intel.com/PRTS_UI/prtsresult.php?task_id=3869
Collector: http://tinderbox.sh.intel.com/PRTS_UI/prtsresult.php?task_id=3874
Comparison:
http://tinderbox.sh.intel.com/PRTS_UI/prtscompareresult.p
This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector
Here goes the update list in order for better reviewers assignment:
Patch drm/i915: Check the minimum pitch for the user framebuffer - Reviewer:
Patch drm/i915: M
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 05:32:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>
> This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector
>
> It was 4 rounds out of date what made it hard to get old patches. However
> Daniel and Jani didn't
This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector
It was 4 rounds out of date what made it hard to get old patches. However
Daniel and Jani didn't leave
many patches behind.
0 on Apr 4 - Apr 16
1 on Apr 16 - May 6
2 on M
This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector
It was 4 rounds out of date what made it hard to get old patches. However
Daniel and Jani didn't leave
many patches behind.
0 on Apr 4 - Apr 16
1 on Apr 16 - May 6
2 on M
16 matches
Mail list logo
