philipnee commented on PR #15688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15688#issuecomment-2090947138
Hi @kirktrue - It was clearly documented why LegacyKafkaConsumer would do
this, maybe it is because in some scenarios users want to update the position
but actually don't care about the
kirktrue commented on PR #15688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15688#issuecomment-2048148062
@philipnee—sorry I'm late to the party, but why do we submit the event to
the queue when the timeout is 0?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
lucasbru merged PR #15688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15688
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache
philipnee opened a new pull request, #15688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15688
beginningOrEndOffset and offsetforTimes should send a ListOffsetEvent and
return empty results if the provided timeout is zero.
A minor change to the mock timer with zero timeout in AsyncConsu