On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Rolf Huehne wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 08:38 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> > Probably not. I didn't realize we were talking about quite so many nodes.
> > Still, the UFF field is interesting because it might work with any
> geometry
> > -- leaving angles out all together.
On 10/07/2014 04:50 PM, Angel Herráez wrote:
> Hi Rolf
>
> This is interesting but not what I can really discuss about, but I'd
> contribute one or two hints:
>
> One really nice thing (I've seen it in other tree viewers) would be
> the ability for the user to pull a node and have the whole thing
>
Hi Rolf
This is interesting but not what I can really discuss about, but I'd
contribute one or two hints:
One really nice thing (I've seen it in other tree viewers) would be
the ability for the user to pull a node and have the whole thing
rearrange dynamically. That's a force field and Jmol a
On 10/06/2014 08:38 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> Probably not. I didn't realize we were talking about quite so many nodes.
> Still, the UFF field is interesting because it might work with any geometry
> -- leaving angles out all together. We might have to add something to get
> it to ignore certain e