I checked in the changes a few minutes ago and released the plugin to dist.
Let me know if anyone has any problems.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've made some changes to the wmsplugin so that discovering available
> layers at a particular WMS URL is a lot eas
Am 01.09.2010 20:58, Dirk Stöcker:
Hello,
I improved the JOSM applet stuff and implemented the major parts of
preferences storage on server.
Fixes related to #3142 would be welcome, so we can have a online editor.
I need help a bit:
I want to change http://josm.openstreetmap.de/applet in a wa
2010/9/1 Iván Sánchez Ortega :
> El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 13:21:26, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dijo:
>> PS: See attached screenshot: I didn't change the resolution manually.
>
> That tells us little. What's the console output?
pasted it here:
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5400
as you ca
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Hi,
GPX upload from within JOSM stopped working for me a good time ago.
SInce then, I have not uploaded any tracks, which is a shame, since I
normally think of tracks as documentation for new map features (in case
someone postulates that features have been copied from
Hi,
GPX upload from within JOSM stopped working for me a good time ago.
SInce then, I have not uploaded any tracks, which is a shame, since I
normally think of tracks as documentation for new map features (in
case someone postulates that features have been copied from somewhere
else.)
T
2010/9/1 Iván Sánchez Ortega
> El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 18:25:51, Dirk Stöcker dijo:
> > No it uses EPSG:4326 when Mercator is selected. The distortion resulting
> > from that is very low due to the tile mechanism and working at high zoom
> > levels.
> >
> > This "silently assume Mercat
El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 18:25:51, Dirk Stöcker dijo:
> No it uses EPSG:4326 when Mercator is selected. The distortion resulting
> from that is very low due to the tile mechanism and working at high zoom
> levels.
>
> This "silently assume Mercator is EPSG:4326" should also exist in the
>
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ian Dees wrote:
Unless the plugin is stretching or reprojecting the image locally somehow,
the WMS plugin will have to send the GetMap WMS request with an SRS set to
whatever the projection is in JOSM (which causes the server to send back an
image in the right projection). If
2010/9/1 Iván Sánchez Ortega
> El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 17:20:53, Ian Dees dijo:
> > My update does check the available CRS from GetCapabilities for each
> layer
> > and will flag a layer as unusable if it doesn't match the current
> > projection set in JOSM's preferences.
>
> Wait a se
El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 17:20:53, Ian Dees dijo:
> My update does check the available CRS from GetCapabilities for each layer
> and will flag a layer as unusable if it doesn't match the current
> projection set in JOSM's preferences.
Wait a second there.
So what if I query a epsg:4326
El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 13:21:26, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dijo:
> PS: See attached screenshot: I didn't change the resolution manually.
That tells us little. What's the console output?
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega
Un ordenador no es una televisión ni un microondas: es una herramienta
complej
I have recently big issues with WMS-resolution. Has the default
behaviour changed? It looks to me as if JOSM would change the
resolution automatically. Can you confirm this? Is this supposed to be
a feature or is it a bug? I'd consider it the latter and ask you to
restore the default behaviour from
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Ian Dees wrote:
I've made some changes to the wmsplugin so that discovering available layers
at a particular WMS URL is a lot easier. What's the best way to have people
test this and then get it published so that an update gets pushed out to
users?
Depending on the degree
13 matches
Mail list logo
