the automatic
reviewboard integration
2. run some rbt command line invocation to update reviewboard with the
upstream branch name
I just don't recall the exact invocation for #2 and I don't want to
experiment and muck something up :)
Cheers,
--
John Weldon
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev
+1 to the Third Way
(and to single space)
--
John Weldon
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Jesse Meek jesse.m...@canonical.com
wrote:
I take that as +1 from Dave.
On 19/11/14 13:13, David Cheney wrote:
To quote Butterick's
http://practicaltypography.com/one-space-between-sentences.html
something like:
juju status action:mysq/0_a_3
which would be the string representation of the actions Tag.
Is there a compelling reason to use UUID?
Cheers,
--
John Weldon
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
Forgot to reply-all
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Weldon johnweld...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: Actions :: UUID vs. Tag on command line
To: Gustavo Niemeyer gustavo.nieme...@canonical.com
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer
by the sequence number?
--
John Weldon
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
will probably be reflected back to the user in some
sort of a manageable hash or hex format
--
John Weldon
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer gust...@niemeyer.net
wrote:
On Fri Oct 24 2014 at 4:30:38 PM John Weldon johnweld...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ordered execution wasn't addressed
Hmm; makes sense, but this will require some refactoring, because the
watcher collects and returns the id's of new actions as an unordered set,
as it stands today.
I'll start working on this.
--
John Weldon
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer gust...@niemeyer.net
wrote:
For 2
for actions.
Thanks!
--
John Weldon
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:59 AM, John Weldon johnweld...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have any interest or investment in using or publishing Actions for
Juju please review and contribute!
I'm very thankful for all the discussion so far.
I'll try to capture all of the suggestions here
/d/1uYffkkGA1njQ1oego_h8BYBMrlGpmN_lwsnrOZFxE9Q/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks
--
John Weldon
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
is a StringsWatcher, and the .Changes() are []string
I'm assuming that will have to become a more specialised watcher where
.Changes() returns a list of objects representing the composite key? Also
how the watcher detects relevant events might have to be adjusted somewhat.
--
John Weldon
--
Juju
public
history.
That's how I have been working already, but I'd like to know if that is a
problem for some reason.
--
John Weldon
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
, and sometimes bits3rpent
:)
--
John Weldon
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Mike Sam mikesam...@gmail.com wrote:
I know juju run is out but I am wondering when we should expect Actions
that do not require ssh access to the machines?
Also, will actions allow arbitrary (defined at runtime
13 matches
Mail list logo