Hi,
apologies for the bad subject line - couldn't think of a way to condence
my question into one line in a good ay. Let me explain what I'm trying
to do:
I've got 87.238.32/19 allocated from the RIPE NCC, and I intend to split
it between our existing Norwegian site and our up-and-coming
Hey Richard, I had raised 101569 for the bypass bouncing after bandwidth
related resignal, and was told by DE this was expected behavior. At the
time the explanation made sense. If a bypass m is protecting lsp n, and
lsp n is torn down, for any reason and in any manner (make before break
or not),
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:41:42AM -0700, Harry Reynolds wrote:
Hey Richard, I had raised 101569 for the bypass bouncing after bandwidth
related resignal, and was told by DE this was expected behavior. At the
time the explanation made sense. If a bypass m is protecting lsp n, and
lsp n is torn
Hi, Does anyone know how to activate (apply) Radius authentication for
subscriber management on an MX node?
I have subscribers configured for dynamic access through an external DHCP
server.
For some reason, I'm getting the DHCP address without being first
authenticated on MX through Radius. I'm
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marlon Duksa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] subscriber access on MX
To: Christopher Hartley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hmm, in this case below you have the authenticator hierarchy under dot1x.
But I can't find
What's the best RE-333 version to run? Latest 9.x or 8.x or what?
I deal with some re-333s on 7.5R1.12 now and it's fine. So maybe this
is just a stupid question.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi,
I am reading about BFD - Bidirectional Forwarding Detection. I am in
confused that why some routing protocol have already the keepalive
engine still need to enforce with BFD?
Thanks,
Fitter
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 09:25:14 Fitter wrote:
I am reading about BFD - Bidirectional Forwarding
Detection. I am in confused that why some routing
protocol have already the keepalive engine still need to
enforce with BFD?
Because most routing protocols would generally employ
intervals
And also, if your routing protocols have 100 neighbors? what will you do if you
want to change the hello timer?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Tue, 30 Sep
2008 09:34:15 +0800 CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BFD? On
Tuesday 30 September 2008
apply-groups come in handy for this sort of thing, if I understand
your example.
David
2008/9/29 zhouyifeng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And also, if your routing protocols have 100 neighbors? what will you do if
you want to change the hello timer?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
10 matches
Mail list logo