On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 02:50:03AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > In a couple of cases I have had the need to include a Kconfig file only
> > if present.
> > The current 'source' directive works as one would expect. It bails out
> > if the file
Hi,
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> In a couple of cases I have had the need to include a Kconfig file only
> if present.
> The current 'source' directive works as one would expect. It bails out
> if the file is missing.
I don't really like it, it's an open invitation to abuse.
I'd ra