On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 15:41:17 Rick Stockton wrote:
. short discussion of the feature, and possible follow-ups .
very nice; does this mean it's been merged into qt5 already or that the code
exists and is waiting to be merged into
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, November 7, 2011 16:35:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> Maybe we should really resurrect the existence of a master 4.8?
>
> unecessary imho, and runs the extreme danger of repeating the 3->4 debacle
> with kdelibs where people just keep working on the stable relea
On Friday, 11 de November de 2011 00.26.23, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please be informed that KSecretsService components were included into
> the main repositories as follows:
>
> *kdelibs/kdeui/ksecretsservice*
> API intented for the applications. Will replace KWallet API.
> commit id be
On Thursday, 10 de November de 2011 22.30.18, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just pushed the new API to kdelibs and kdepepo (Christoph Feck) has an
> IRC inquiry I find right.
>
> This new API's location was initially guided by the KWallet API
> location, that is kdeui. Is this location righ
Hello,
Please be informed that KSecretsService components were included into
the main repositories as follows:
*kdelibs/kdeui/ksecretsservice*
API intented for the applications. Will replace KWallet API.
commit id before was
6b6af2d3889ecd53ce1aa1a00b1befcbc244610c
*kdelibs/kdeui/util/kwall
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103109/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime and Andreas Schneider.
Description
---
> On Nov. 10, 2011, 10:02 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I would like to see this in kdelibs 4.8. It is a rather minor change and
> > should be fine for 4.7 as well. But I don't know what's the state for
> > additions to kdelibs currently...
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> The freeze is today
On 11/10/2011 10:30 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2011, Valentin Rusu wrote:
Hello,
I just pushed the new API to kdelibs and kdepepo (Christoph Feck) has an
IRC inquiry I find right.
This new API's location was initially guided by the KWallet API
location, that is kdeui
On Thursday 10 November 2011, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just pushed the new API to kdelibs and kdepepo (Christoph Feck) has an
> IRC inquiry I find right.
>
> This new API's location was initially guided by the KWallet API
> location, that is kdeui. Is this location right ? It's easy fo
Hello,
I just pushed the new API to kdelibs and kdepepo (Christoph Feck) has an
IRC inquiry I find right.
This new API's location was initially guided by the KWallet API
location, that is kdeui. Is this location right ? It's easy for me to
move it now, after next release (6 months) it will b
Hello Olivier,
Now that the KSecretsService API joined kdelibs, branch 4.7, I'm now
preparing to move the ksecretsserviced from the playground to kde-runtime.
The review request was posted several days ago @kde-core-devel.
Cheers,
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (forme
FYI
Original Message
Subject: [Bug 286298] New: Please move ksecrets repo from kdereview to
"KDE Utils"
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:46:40 +
From: Valentin Rusu
Reply-To: bug-cont...@bugs.kde.org
To: k...@rusu.info
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=286
> On Nov. 10, 2011, 10:02 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I would like to see this in kdelibs 4.8. It is a rather minor change and
> > should be fine for 4.7 as well. But I don't know what's the state for
> > additions to kdelibs currently...
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> The freeze is today
> On Nov. 10, 2011, 10:02 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I would like to see this in kdelibs 4.8. It is a rather minor change and
> > should be fine for 4.7 as well. But I don't know what's the state for
> > additions to kdelibs currently...
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> The freeze is today
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102929/#review8109
---
This review has been submitted with commit
6b6af2d3889ecd53ce1a
Am Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:54:33 +0100
schrieb andrea diamantini :
> 2011/11/10 Aaron J. Seigo
> > actually, Qt5 is irrelevant to most of the work that needs to be
> > done in frameworks. we can, and are, working against Qt4 right now.
> > most of the work
> > is modularization and modernization (whi
2011/11/10 Aaron J. Seigo
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 23:44:21 Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > 4.x is where I'm living/fighting/coding/writing now.
>
> for apps and workspaces, that is perfect. we don't want to disrupt app and
> workspace development while we get kdelibs prepped for the next ma
On Wednesday 09 November 2011, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> >> [Components-platform]
> >> name=touch
> >
> > something Sune just noted to me..
> > maybe an environment variable would be better to chose this?
>
> As on override? For that, I'd say +1, otherwise -1 :)
i added KDE_PLASMA_COMPONENTS_PLATFORM
On Thursday 10 November 2011 10:14:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 23:44:21 Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > And it will be based on the upcoming (not yet released) Qt 4.8.
>
> sure; but this is a non-relevant detail.
Indeed...
> > Thinking about "frameworks" without havin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101701/#review8071
---
This review has been submitted with commit
617b08f5f6652bb9d918
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103099/
---
Review request for kdelibs and Martin Gräßlin.
Description
---
For KW
> On Nov. 9, 2011, 8:50 p.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > It's already fixed, at least in master. The patch is wrong, too, because
> > that signal doesn't exists in QSpinBox. Looks like you did not test it :)
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Sorry, I failed reading, forget what I wrote.
>
>
> On Nov. 10, 2011, 10:02 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I would like to see this in kdelibs 4.8. It is a rather minor change and
> > should be fine for 4.7 as well. But I don't know what's the state for
> > additions to kdelibs currently...
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> The freeze is today
> On Nov. 10, 2011, 10:02 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I would like to see this in kdelibs 4.8. It is a rather minor change and
> > should be fine for 4.7 as well. But I don't know what's the state for
> > additions to kdelibs currently...
The freeze is today, which means it has to go in to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103099/#review8082
---
I would like to see this in kdelibs 4.8. It is a rather minor ch
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Rick Stockton
wrote:
> My thanks to you, MGrasslin, Aaron, Todd rme, and Thiago for coaching me
> towards this achievement. The new code is small, and VERY simple. We have no
> API changes (at least, not yet--- we should implement a mouse button mask
> "getter" as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103098/#review8080
---
This review has been submitted with commit
999eac446a49e6126df0
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103098/#review8079
---
Ship it!
Yep, looks good.
- David Faure
On Nov. 9, 2011, 9:4
On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 15:41:17 Rick Stockton wrote:
> no API changes (at least, not yet--- we should implement a mouse button
> mask "getter" as a new feature, but that's for later in the 5.x series. It
> won't have any BC issues.) I will need to write doco of the new
> Qt::MouseButton val
On Wednesday, November 9, 2011 23:44:21 Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> 4.x is where I'm living/fighting/coding/writing now.
for apps and workspaces, that is perfect. we don't want to disrupt app and
workspace development while we get kdelibs prepped for the next major release.
> I'm sorry to say, in
30 matches
Mail list logo
