On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Abu Rasheda wrote:
> I have my implementation of socket APIs,
>
> I sock_unregister(AF_INET); & sock_register(&inet_family_ops), this replaces
> kernel resident socket related calls with my socket related calls. My code
> is loaded as kernel module.
>
> My question,
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Vipul Jain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to move the hardware watchdog pet code from user space to
> kernel space inside the ipmi module and would like to know how to go about
> pet the hardware watchdog at periodic interval. Any pointers help will be
a cursory gla
Use queue_delayed_work
Thanks,
Arun
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Vipul Jain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to move the hardware watchdog pet code from user space to
> kernel space inside the ipmi module and would like to know how to go about
> pet the hardware watchdog at periodic interval. A
Hi,
I would like to move the hardware watchdog pet code from user space to
kernel space inside the ipmi module and would like to know how to go about
pet the hardware watchdog at periodic interval. Any pointers help will be
really appreciated.
Regards,
Vipul.
_
I have my implementation of socket APIs,
I sock_unregister(AF_INET); & sock_register(&inet_family_ops), this
replaces kernel resident socket related calls with my socket related calls.
My code is loaded as kernel module.
My question, is Linux kernel able to call its own socket call more
efficient