https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Joy Nelson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@bywatersolutions.com
---
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #31 from Marcel de Rooy ---
Thx for following up, Martin.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #29 from Martin Renvoize ---
Created attachment 101667
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=101667&action=edit
Bug 21800: (RM follow-up) Fix unit tests
We were not setting the repeatable flag
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #30 from Martin Renvoize ---
Nice work everyone!
Pushed to master for 20.05
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing li
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #28 from Martin Renvoize ---
Nice work everyone!
Pushed to master for 20.05
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing li
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Martin Renvoize changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version(s)||20.05.00
released
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99520|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99519|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99517|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99518|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Signed Off |Passed QA
--
You are rece
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #23 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Ere Maijala from comment #18)
> I failed to realize that the code checks for the pipe character first. So
> the database call doesn't actually get executed that often. Sorry about
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99313|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99311|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99310|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99309|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #18 from Ere Maijala ---
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #17)
> (In reply to Ere Maijala from comment #16)
> > If it's in a separate issue, how do we make sure bug 24715 and this one are
> > committed at same tim
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff
--
You are
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #17 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Ere Maijala from comment #16)
> If it's in a separate issue, how do we make sure bug 24715 and this one are
> committed at same time? My concern is that this one alone will introdu
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #16 from Ere Maijala ---
If it's in a separate issue, how do we make sure bug 24715 and this one are
committed at same time? My concern is that this one alone will introduce a
serious performance regression, and if 24715
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24715
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #15 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Ere Maijala from comment #13)
> Sorry, I'd say that caching is pretty crucial. TransformKohaToMarc is used
> also e.g. in the Elasticsearch index builder, OAI-PMH Provider and expo
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #14 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Ere Maijala from comment #13)
> Ok, I'm fine with the framework stuff, but it strikes me a bit odd that we
> use mapping from default framework and repeatability from another. Unle
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |Failed QA
--- Comment #13 fro
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff
--- Comment
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |Failed QA
--- Comment #11 fro
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #10 from Ere Maijala ---
Why isn't the default framework also authoritative for repeatability? If not,
at least the framework information should be fetched e.g. with
GetMarcSubfieldStructure so that it's cached to avoid a
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ere.maij...@helsinki.fi
--
Y
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #99312|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #8 from Marcel de Rooy ---
Created attachment 99312
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=99312&action=edit
Bug 21800: Add tests for _check_split
This new subroutine supports checking the repe
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #98816|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #7 from Marcel de Rooy ---
Created attachment 99311
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=99311&action=edit
Bug 21800: Check the correct framework for the repeatable tag
This depends on the fr
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #98817|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are re
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Patch complexity|--- |Small patch
St
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.koha-community
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #4 from Marcel de Rooy ---
Created attachment 98817
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=98817&action=edit
Bug 21800: Make TransformKohaToMarc aware of non-repeatable subfields
If a kohafield
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #3 from Marcel de Rooy ---
Created attachment 98816
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=98816&action=edit
Bug 21800: Add tests for repeatable subfields
Test plan:
Do not apply the second pat
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #2 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #1)
> At the same time wondering if we not should allow some item subfields to be
> repeatable just as some under in MARC21 852 ?
We should. We can spec
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.koha-community
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.koha-community
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
--- Comment #1 from Marcel de Rooy ---
At the same time wondering if we not should allow some item subfields to be
repeatable just as some under in MARC21 852 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug chang
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21800
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
45 matches
Mail list logo