On 07/03/2012 08:33 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.07.2012 19:33, schrieb Eric Blake:
On 07/02/2012 04:16 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Can we discuss the future of 'getfd', the possibility of 'pass-fd', or
even the enhancement of
Am 02.07.2012 19:33, schrieb Eric Blake:
> On 07/02/2012 04:16 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> Can we discuss the future of 'getfd', the possibility of 'pass-fd', or
> even the enhancement of all existing monitor commands
On 07/02/2012 04:16 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Can we discuss the future of 'getfd', the possibility of 'pass-fd', or
even the enhancement of all existing monitor commands to take an
optional 'nfds' JSON argument for atomic