On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:22:50PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/12/17 4:33, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 04:06:49PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 2015/12/16 15:31, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> > But in this case, you're returning an error if
On 17/12/15 10:10, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/12/17 17:38, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 17/12/15 08:41, Shannon Zhao wrote:
On 2015/12/17 16:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:22:50 +0800
>> Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On
On 2015/12/17 17:38, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 17/12/15 08:41, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2015/12/17 16:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:22:50 +0800
>>> >> Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>> >>
>
>
> On 2015/12/17 4:33, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>>
On 17/12/15 08:41, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/12/17 16:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:22:50 +0800
>> Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>
On 2015/12/17 4:33, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 04:06:49PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
Hi,
>
On 2015/12/17 16:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:22:50 +0800
> Shannon Zhao wrote:
>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2015/12/17 4:33, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 04:06:49PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 2015/12/16 15:31, Shannon
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:22:50 +0800
Shannon Zhao wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/12/17 4:33, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 04:06:49PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 2015/12/16 15:31, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> > But in this case, you're returning an error if it is
On 2015/12/17 4:33, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 04:06:49PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2015/12/16 15:31, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> But in this case, you're returning an error if it is *not*
> initialized.
> I understand that in that case y
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 04:06:49PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2015/12/16 15:31, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >> > But in this case, you're returning an error if it is *not*
> >> > initialized.
> >> > I understand that in that case you cannot return an interrupt
> >> > n
On 2015/12/16 17:04, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 16/12/15 08:06, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 2015/12/16 15:31, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> But in this case, you're returning an error if it is *not*
> initialized.
> I understand that in tha
On 16/12/15 08:06, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2015/12/16 15:31, Shannon Zhao wrote:
But in this case, you're returning an error if it is *not* initialized.
I understand that in that case you cannot return an interrupt number
(-1
would be weird), but retur
Hi,
On 2015/12/16 15:31, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> > But in this case, you're returning an error if it is *not*
>> > initialized.
>> > I understand that in that case you cannot return an interrupt number
>> > (-1
>> > would be weird), but returning -EBUSY feels even more we
On 2015/12/16 4:47, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> > On 15/12/15 15:50, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 2015/12/15 23:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On 15/12/15 08:49, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> > From: Shannon Z
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 15/12/15 15:50, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2015/12/15 23:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On 15/12/15 08:49, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao
>
> Add a new kvm device type KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 for ARM
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 15/12/15 15:50, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2015/12/15 23:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On 15/12/15 08:49, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao
>
> Add a new kvm device type KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 for ARM
On 15/12/15 15:50, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/12/15 23:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 15/12/15 08:49, Shannon Zhao wrote:
From: Shannon Zhao
Add a new kvm device type KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 for ARM PMU. Implement
the kvm_device_ops for it.
Signed-off-by: Shann
On 2015/12/15 23:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 15/12/15 08:49, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>From: Shannon Zhao
>
>Add a new kvm device type KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 for ARM PMU. Implement
>the kvm_device_ops for it.
>
>Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
>---
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt | 16
On 15/12/15 08:49, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao
>
> Add a new kvm device type KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PMU_V3 for ARM PMU. Implement
> the kvm_device_ops for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
> ---
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-pmu.txt | 16
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/
17 matches
Mail list logo