On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 2:10 PM Steve Allen wrote:
> On Mon 2023-03-20T19:36:51+ Michael Deckers via LEAPSECS hath writ:
> > � This seems to be lenient enough to allow for not scheduling
> > � a negative leap second even in the case that the difference
> > � (UT1 - UTC) should go a bit below
On Mon 2023-03-20T19:36:51+ Michael Deckers via LEAPSECS hath writ:
> � This seems to be lenient enough to allow for not scheduling
> � a negative leap second even in the case that the difference
> � (UT1 - UTC) should go a bit below -1 s before 2035.
And today in the NTP working group mail
