xed dates for the sake of
schedule.
-Alberto
On 05/05/2018 21:12, Fernando Frediani wrote:
I didn't mention forcing people at any point. Just having someone to
be in charge in order to organize certain things, get people's
availability and make more thing happen.
With regards sched
edule.
-Alberto
On 05/05/2018 20:41, Fernando Frediani wrote:
One characteristic from OpenWrt, different from other projects is the
lack of a leader or a person who can gather others together, make
some decisions or push for them to happen. If one doesn't like this
title it can also be
One characteristic from OpenWrt, different from other projects is the
lack of a leader or a person who can gather others together, make some
decisions or push for them to happen. If one doesn't like this title it
can also be "Project Manager" or "Project Coordinator". This, in my
view, makes a
Great achievement. Congratulations to all involved.
On the naming topic have in mind the weight OpenWRT has given its
history in all these years. I personally think this point is the
easiest.
Given the agreements continue hopefully there will be a single one
great project again soon with all bene
That's why I am an adept of hierarchy or at least have well defined
who is responsible for what, otherwise when something is sent to all
nobody will care much to respond unless that affects him/her directly
in some way.
I'm not talking about someone giving orders and others following it,
but just h
A while ago in the begining of the project, put my time and myself to
be one of the responsible to set it up, give it LEDE's face, and start
transfering content from OpenWrt but unfortunatelly almost nobody
bored much at the time. It seemed that if you are not a "known person"
you might not get muc
This is a fantastic thing in OpenWrt and very helpful and I think
should be ported to LEDEas is. And I made myself available to help
with this once a Wiki is defined. However, if I understood correctlly,
someone pointed that "we" don't want specific device page which is
strange in my point of view.
Fully agree.
Fernando
On 17 May 2016 at 06:02, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On 17/05/16 09:46, andrew wrote:
>> How about something like rocket.chat or one of the opensource self
>> hosted alternatives?
>
> Don't get me wrong, the problem is not IRC itself, there are definetly
> good uses for it. I'm
Has anyone got this message at all ? Or it seems this topic isn't that
important or necessary.
Who is the person in charge of the infrastructure stuff for the project ?
Fernando
On 6 May 2016 at 00:25, Fernando Frediani wrote:
> So is this on the list to be done ?
> I am put
+1
Fernando
On 6 May 2016 at 12:05, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have noticed that some of the policies of this project are already
> veering towards a brand of technical elitism that I feel is completely
> contrary to the stated goal of having a stronger community.
>
> A strong commu
So is this on the list to be done ?
I am putting myself available to deploy, configure and perhaps add and
move some content into it.
If it´s the case whoever is looking after the infrastructure stuff may
contact me in private for arrangements.
Thanks
Fernando
On 5 May 2016 at 01:08, Kus wrote:
progress better.
Come on. It´s not a big thing and it helps some people to organize
their mailboxes in the way they prefer.
We are talking about just 10 extra characters !
Fernando
On 5 May 2016 at 13:43, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On 16-05-05 11:23 AM, Fernando Frediani wrote:
>> Quick
Quick question to those who don't like the idea of having a prefix in
the subject: Is this a big deal ?
Cannot this be compromised in favour of having this enabled for those
who need it for the reasons justified in previous messages ?
Thanks
Fernando
On 5 May 2016 at 05:37, David Lang wrote:
> O
Fully agree with David Lang's points.
+1 for prefix
Fernando
On 5 May 2016 at 02:36, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2016, John Crispin wrote:
>
>> On 04/05/2016 23:31, Aaron Z wrote:
>>>
>>> On many (most?) mailing lists, there is a prefix on all subjects which
>>> has the list name (such as
Hi,
Any plans to have a Wiki for LEDE, preferably using the MediaWiki software ?
I personally think MediaWiki is a great software, easy to maintain and
upgrade plus the fact that many people know how to write on it.
Also is possible to have a clean presentation for the pages created
specially for
15 matches
Mail list logo
