Hello legal folks,
I would like some opinions on a license called Nagios Open Software License,
used in nrdp (Review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
id=1284132).
It has "open" in the name and the preambule look good ("to deal in the
Software without restriction, including
> "RM" == Robert-André Mauchin writes:
RM> It it Fedora-compatible?
I can't imagine this could be considered free.
We do allow clauses that say you must change the name if you fork. So
do we allow clauses that say you _cannot_ change the name if you fork?
And clause 6
IANAL.
Jason L Tibbitts III writes:
> I can't imagine this could be considered free.
>
> We do allow clauses that say you must change the name if you fork. So
> do we allow clauses that say you _cannot_ change the name if you fork?
We really should not obscure what this