Re: [lfs-dev] Error with check-0.9.9

2012-12-02 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 02/12/2012 11:31, Pierre Labastie a écrit : > [...] > After gcc-pass2, using the dummy.c as in the book, try: > gcc -v -Wl,--verbose dummy.c -lrt 2>&1 | grep '\( \|usr\)/lib' > I get: > found libpthread.so.0 at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 > (see 'at /lib/...' instead of 'at /tools/lib

Re: [lfs-dev] Error with check-0.9.9

2012-12-02 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 26/11/2012 09:06, Pierre Labastie a écrit : > First, I confirm that without any flag, everything went well. Actually not: I had forgotten to remove LDFLAGS=-lpthread from the configure command, which I had added for testing. So the error is still there. I think I have found the reason. After gc

Re: [lfs-dev] Error with check-0.9.9

2012-11-26 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 25/11/2012 23:38, Ken Moffat a écrit : > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:04:01PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> At this place in the book, everything should be independant on what is >> on the host, shouldn't it ? librt and libpthread are both from glibc. I >> more suspect the optimization, as po

Re: [lfs-dev] Error with check-0.9.9

2012-11-25 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:04:01PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > At this place in the book, everything should be independant on what is > on the host, shouldn't it ? librt and libpthread are both from glibc. I > more suspect the optimization, as pointed out by Armin. Trying again > without op

Re: [lfs-dev] Error with check-0.9.9

2012-11-25 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 25/11/2012 19:06, Matt Burgess a écrit : > Hmm, on a Fedora 17 host, I get: > > checking for pipe... yes > checking for putenv... yes > checking for setenv... yes > checking for sleep... yes > checking for strdup... yes > checking for strsignal... yes > checking for unsetenv... yes > > Looks lik

Re: [lfs-dev] Error with check-0.9.9

2012-11-25 Thread Armin K.
Alright, I've checked everything again. On 11/25/2012 05:37 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hello, > > I know it has been reported by Tobias on lfs-support, but it seems to me > it is an issue with the current version of check, and it should be > addressed in the book: > - the error occurs during mak

Re: [lfs-dev] Error with check-0.9.9

2012-11-25 Thread Matt Burgess
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 17:37 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hello, > > I know it has been reported by Tobias on lfs-support, but it seems to me > it is an issue with the current version of check, and it should be > addressed in the book: > - the error occurs during make: > --

Re: [lfs-dev] Error with check-0.9.9

2012-11-25 Thread Armin K.
Dana 25.11.2012 17:37, Pierre Labastie je napisao: > Hello, > > I know it has been reported by Tobias on lfs-support, but it seems to me > it is an issue with the current version of check, and it should be > addressed in the book: > - the error occurs during make: > > /

[lfs-dev] Error with check-0.9.9

2012-11-25 Thread Pierre Labastie
Hello, I know it has been reported by Tobias on lfs-support, but it seems to me it is an issue with the current version of check, and it should be addressed in the book: - the error occurs during make: /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_