Re: [lfs-support] ACL check errors: are they important?

On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:14:31 +0100 Ken Moffat wrote: > From memory (so, I might be wrong) the book doesn't ever create a > 'users' group in LFS... > > So, I _guess_ that the 'users' group exists on your host system and > you will need to create it in LFS to get these tests to work. > > ĸen

Re: [lfs-support] ACL check errors: are they important?

Le 22/04/2014 13:31, Hazel Russman a écrit : > On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:14:31 +0100 > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> From memory (so, I might be wrong) the book doesn't ever create a >> 'users' group in LFS... >> >> So, I _guess_ that the 'users' group exists on your host system and >> you will need to

Re: [lfs-support] ACL check errors: are they important?

On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:42:58 +0200 Pierre Labastie wrote: > It seems that the "bin" group membership > of the "daemon" user is not needed. Could you confirm? Confirmed. It is also not necessary to set real home directories or shells for the bin and daemon users as specified in BLFS. /dev/null an

Re: [lfs-support] ACL check errors: are they important?

Le 22/04/2014 17:51, Hazel Russman a écrit : > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:42:58 +0200 > Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> It seems that the "bin" group membership >> of the "daemon" user is not needed. Could you confirm? > > Confirmed. It is also not necessary to set real home directories or > shells for

Re: [lfs-support] ACL check errors: are they important?

Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 22/04/2014 17:51, Hazel Russman a écrit : >> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:42:58 +0200 >> Pierre Labastie wrote: >> >>> It seems that the "bin" group membership >>> of the "daemon" user is not needed. Could you confirm? >> >> Confirmed. It is also not necessary to set real hom

[lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch

http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch not found. There's only svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patch -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscra

Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch

On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch > not found. > > There's only > svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patch > Patches get copied when online book is

Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch

2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. : > On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch >> not found. >> >> There's only >> svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patc

Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch

xinglp wrote: > 2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. : >> On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: >>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch >>> not found. >>> >>> There's only >>> svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8

Re: [lfs-support] error when trying to cross compile glibc-2.19

Thanks all. Indeed changing the target name, was the solution to be able to build. Marian > > On Apr 19, 2014, at 12:42 AM, mar...@byteanywhere.com wrote: > >> Thanks all for the replays. >> I am trying to create a cross compiler using the steps for building >> LFS >> when the temporary tools

Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch

2014-04-23 13:55 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs : > xinglp wrote: >> 2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. : >>> On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch not found. There's only svn://svn.linuxf