On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 07:42:39AM -0600, Rob wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> But for your SSD I'm guessing that you might not be using fstrim
> (either manually, or the ',discard' option in the fstab), and
> therefore writing a new block means it has sufficiently filled up
> that it needs to shuffle
On 3/6/20 6:11 AM, Thomas Seeling wrote:
Hallo,
I did some comparing of build times.
Building was done on an older i5-6500 with 16 GB RAM, SATA harddisk and SSD.
9.1 build on SSD:
The SBU unit value is equal to 117 seconds.
Total time required to build the system:79.6 SBU
8.3
Hallo Ken,
>> 9.1 build on SSD:
>> The SBU unit value is equal to 117 seconds.
>> Total time required to build the system: 79.6 SBU
> The SBU in LFS is related to the _host_ system
I build LFS on its older version. If it works I build with that LFS to
the 2nd partition (I'm using a
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 01:11:05PM +0100, Thomas Seeling wrote:
> Hallo,
>
>
> I did some comparing of build times.
> Building was done on an older i5-6500 with 16 GB RAM, SATA harddisk and SSD.
>
> 9.1 build on SSD:
> The SBU unit value is equal to 117 seconds.
> Total time required to build th
Ken Moffat wrote:
But for your SSD I'm guessing that you might not be using fstrim
(either manually, or the ',discard' option in the fstab), and
therefore writing a new block means it has sufficiently filled up
that it needs to shuffle things about.
I thought that trim stuff was all handled auto
Hallo,
I did some comparing of build times.
Building was done on an older i5-6500 with 16 GB RAM, SATA harddisk and SSD.
9.1 build on SSD:
The SBU unit value is equal to 117 seconds.
Total time required to build the system:79.6 SBU
8.3 build on HD:
The SBU unit value is equal t