Hi all,
I just wanted to clarify something regarding the instructions for
building Systemd in LFS 8.2-rc1. Some of the commands include
“LANG=en_US.UTF-8” in them. Should this be adjusted for your local
language (i.e. “en_IE.UTF-8” in my case as I’m based in Ireland) or
should they be left verbati
On 11 February 2018 at 19:30, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 07:10:41PM +0000, Mark Pokorny wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I’ve been away for a while, but am back now starting a new SVN build
>> of LFS. Since I’ve been away, however, the Spectre/Meltdown iss
Hi all,
I’ve been away for a while, but am back now starting a new SVN build
of LFS. Since I’ve been away, however, the Spectre/Meltdown issue has
been discussed at length. I’ve been reading through the archives with
interest, but unfortunately little understanding.
I am currently going through t
> No, this is a bad idea. more is installed later, in 6.66. util-linux.
> Creating a symlink might make the installation fail. The book mentions
> that this test is known to fail and therefore trying to fix it serves no
> purpose, since the failure happens because some program is not installed
> ye
Hi all,
This is just a quick query – one of the tests (help-version) in the
GZip test suite fails due to, it seems, not being able to find the
command ‘more’. I think I have rectified this by creating a symlink
from /usr/bin/more → /usr/bin/less (which was created on the previous
page). Is this wi
Hi all,
Before running the test suite for Systemd-232 in LFS 8.0, the book
states it needs some modification to prevent searching for a programme
that will be installed with Util-Linux later on in the build. This is
done with a sed command:
—
sed -i 's:minix:ext4:g' src/test/test-path-util.c
I am currently working my way through LFS 8.0 (systemd) and have
reached the Attr stage in Chapter 6. I am getting a test failure and
was wondering if anyone had any thoughts as to what might cause it and
whether it is a serious failure:
——
[95] $ ls -s f -- failed
0 f
Hi Hazel,
I just wanted to confirm that this is exactly what I do with my
toolchain on occasion. I am in the process of writing an automation
script for the full LFS-8.0 build (tailored to my
machine/circumstances), and frequently use the backed-up toolchain to
test the progress of the automated b
> I don't understand your question.
> $ ls -ld /lib64
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 13 19:28 /lib64
> ls -l /lib64
> total 0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Feb 13 19:28 ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ->
> ../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Feb 13 19:28 ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 ->
> ../lib/ld-
Hi all,
Just wanted to say a quick thanks for all the hard work in making the
LFS-8.0 book.
In Chapter 6.9 of LFS-8.0-systemd, GLibC-2.25 is configure with two
new options that were not present in LFS-7.10
(‘--enable-stack-protector=strong’ and ‘libc_cv_slibdir=/lib’), and
the information about t
On 19 February 2017 at 22:28, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Hazel Russman wrote:
>>
>> In the sanity tests for glibc, the book says:
>> [Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
>> Note that /lib is now the prefix of our dynamic linker.
>>
>> The output is as shown but the explanation i
OK, I'll make the change in my next commit.
-- Bruce
Cheers Bruce! ;-D
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in w
> Hazel Russman wrote:
>>
>> Minor niggle: I got a failure when running test-getlogin on an Xterm.
>> According to the book, this should pass (it's known to fail on a console).
>
>
> In chapter 6, you are not in an xterm (directly), you are in chroot. Try
> building coreutils directly in an xterm.
Hi again all,
I have a slight confession to make – it seems the issue was more
related to a PEBKAC/PICNIC error than anything else *blush*. When I
changed the kernel configuration to include the USB 3.0 subsystem
yesterday and recompiled the kernel, I somehow forgot to copy it to
the /boot directo
> Thanks Bruce. I gave that a go. It delayed the boot and I could see
> some of the other USB devices being detected (such as the mouse,
> keyboard and an attached printer) as it booted. Unfortunately the part
> where the error begins scrolls off the top of the screen before I can
> read it. Is it
>> I have just finished running through a build of LFS 7.10-systemd and have
>> rebooted my computer. I am currently getting a kernel panic when the kernel
>> is booting. According to the messages on the screen (which I can try and
>> transcribe if anyone needs them), it looks like the kernel ca
Hi All, it’s been a while since I posted here!
I have just finished running through a build of LFS 7.10-systemd and have
rebooted my computer. I am currently getting a kernel panic when the kernel
is booting. According to the messages on the screen (which I can try and
transcribe if anyone needs t
17 matches
Mail list logo