On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, recrusader wrote:
I am not sure that Jed mentioned the following stuff to you.
Now, I can realize GPU computation with libMesh and PETSc in one or two cards.
However, compared to CPU implementation, matrix assembly using GPU is very slow.
I take it the problem is that whe
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, recrusader wrote:
>
> I am not sure that Jed mentioned the following stuff to you.
>> Now, I can realize GPU computation with libMesh and PETSc in one or two
>> cards.
>> However, compared to CPU implementation, matrix
Thank you very much, Roy and Cody.
I did some tests for ex4 in libmesh.
When using a CPU coure, the cost time for solver and matrix assembly
is as follows:
| PetscLinearSolver
|
| solve() 1 69.5099 69.509936
69.5099 69.50
Resending from an email address that is accepted by libmesh-devel
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 14:41, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:11, Cody Permann wrote:
>
>> This is to be expected - if you think about what happens in assembly we
>> are looping over elements and building up just a
