https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #31 from Paul ---
To add to that: of course, a setting for all entries is not mutually exclusive
with the original proposal here. If one wanted finer granularity one could go
to the Entries tab and dial it in, either in lieu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #30 from Paul ---
The mock-up in an early comment is truly great design.
Just to state my needs, however, they are much simpler than even that. All I
would need is a simple check box "Make entries clickable" that would
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
kompilainenn <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
mahfiaz mahf...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ad...@dreamcoder.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #25 from Stephan van den Akker stephanv...@gmail.com ---
@Cor (comment 22)
The discussion about the button was started by me in the comments thread of:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #26 from Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com ---
@Stephen: Well my comment was made with the assumption that all levels wasnt
an entry in the drop down list. If the all levels entry is included in the
drop down list, then it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #23 from Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #21)
Stephan spotted another problem with the dialog: the 'apply to all' button.
The best solution here is to remove this button completely
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #24 from Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl ---
(In reply to Jay Philips from comment #23)
Cant say that i agree with this approach, ...
Hey you, why jumping in with (dis)agreement immediately :) Ask some smart
questions first ;)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #20 from Stephan van den Akker stephanv...@gmail.com ---
Talked it over with a user who up to now has had a lot trouble understanding
the present dailog. He thinks the mockup is a big improvement!
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #21 from Heiko Tietze heiko.tie...@user-prompt.com ---
Stephan spotted another problem with the dialog: the 'apply to all' button. The
best solution here is to remove this button completely and to add an entry in
the levels
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #22 from Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #21)
Stephan spotted another problem with the dialog: the 'apply to all' button.
And that is what?
The best solution here is to remove this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #19 from Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl ---
thanks Jay and Heiko! Looks really good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #18 from Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com ---
Created attachment 114138
-- https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=114138action=edit
gdocs mockup
Heiko and I went through and fixed up the mockup with the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #17 from Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #15)
I'm not sure about it. Currently there are two concepts. One with only
buttons to build the entries-structure-line (used by TOC and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #16 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
I notice in the comments to the related blog post:
http://user-prompt.com/libreoffice-design-session-entries-at-indexes-and-tables/
... that TAB stops are likely to be handled via
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #15 from Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #14)
Do you think we should redesign the complete dialog?
Small steps or the big fish?
I'm not sure about it. Currently there are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #14 from Heiko Tietze heiko.tie...@user-prompt.com ---
We talked about the scope and as stated on G+ doc the redesign is for the tab
'Entries' only. All other content should remain as it is, for now.
But I have to admit that at
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze heiko.tie...@user-prompt.com ---
Regina, if you think 'Heading Text' is not appropriate (sorry for missing
that), what would you suggest? I think that 'Heading Text' and 'Annotation
Text' works well in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze heiko.tie...@user-prompt.com ---
Well spotted. I updated the mockup
* changed 'Text Entry' to 'Heading Text'
* added the item 'User Text value'
* added the grouping title 'Hierarchy'
* changed 'Level' to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #13 from Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de ---
Before trying to find better wording and better design, you have to decide,
whether this dialog has to be used for all kind of indexes (as it is now), or
whether each kind of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #12 from Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com ---
* Its best to keep the original labeling of Entry Text over Heading Text
* User Text seems fine
* 'Level in TOC' isnt good as the label as it wouldnt be abbreviated in other
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #9 from Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de ---
The same dialog is used for indexes as well, and e.g. for an Alphabetical Index
the wording Heading Text does not fit. You will need individual texts for
each kind of use of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #8 from Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #7)
It is confusing to have both Entry Text and Text Entry.
Yes it was confusing, which is why i had proposed to have it to 'Heading
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #6 from Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com ---
We had design session about this dialog and the details can be found at this
google doc -
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #5 from Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com ---
Created attachment 113931
-- https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=113931action=edit
mockup 2
Here is the second mockup that i've been working on. Sophie
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
A (Andy) stgohi-lob...@yahoo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
--- Comment #1 from Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com ---
Created attachment 113635
-- https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=113635action=edit
mockup
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89608
Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
31 matches
Mail list logo