Den 2009-01-15 21:28 skrev Peter Rosin:
(But it just papers over the real bug IMHO)
I have to agree on that.
Even though this is not fixing the real bug, it is the conservative
thing to do, as it closes the regression. Ok to apply with this
ChangeLog?
2009-01-15 Peter Rosin
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:24:50PM CET:
2009-01-15 Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se
Don't settle for any dumpbin/link program as name lister.
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (LT_PATH_NM): When locating dumpbin or
link -dump, check if they appear to really
Hi Ralf,
Den 2009-03-18 18:53 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:24:50PM CET:
2009-01-15 Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se
Don't settle for any dumpbin/link program as name lister.
This one seems really straight forward to me. So again, ok to
Seems fine to me.
//Peter
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rosin [mailto:p...@lysator.liu.se]
Sent: den 15 januari 2009 21:28
To: Libtool Patches List
Cc: Peter Kjellerstedt; Rudolf Leitgeb
Subject: Re: Problem with LT_PATH_NM
[Moving to the patches list]
Peter, Rudolf, are you
14 januari 2009 21:27
To: Peter Kjellerstedt
Cc: bug-libt...@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Problem with LT_PATH_NM
Den 2009-01-14 14:29, skrev Peter Kjellerstedt:
The other day I downloaded and tried to build the latest
version of stable glib (2.18.4) where they apparently had
switched from libtool 1.5.x