I know I'm new here but I'm curious as to why names conflicting with reserved
words
are changed rather than escaped ?
JDBC drivers provide the escape syntax and a list of reserved words for the
database through DatabaseMetaData.
Regards,
Sean.
On 4 Mar 2010, at 12:54, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wr
If you didn't yet send it also to lift-announce.
-
Mads Hartmann Jensen wrote:
Ah yeah I see, it would be looking for a column named blob_c then, right?
So what do you say - I send out a **Potential breaking change** message that
states that if 'blob' is not
Done :)
On 04/03/2010, at 22.38, David Pollak wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Mads Hartmann Jensen
> wrote:
> This has already been on reviewboard and comitted to master - should i send
> out a breaking change note?
>
> Yeah. Send out a breaking change note. The likelihood o
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Mads Hartmann Jensen wrote:
> This has already been on reviewboard and comitted to master - should i send
> out a breaking change note?
>
Yeah. Send out a breaking change note. The likelihood of breakage is low,
but possible.
>
> I'm not sure i get why this is
Sounds proper to me.
-Ross
On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Mads Hartmann Jensen wrote:
> Ah yeah I see, it would be looking for a column named blob_c then, right?
>
> So what do you say - I send out a **Potential breaking change** message that
> states that if 'blob' is not a keyword in your DB a
Ah yeah I see, it would be looking for a column named blob_c then, right?
So what do you say - I send out a **Potential breaking change** message that
states that if 'blob' is not a keyword in your DB and you're currently using
blob as a column name you should change it to blob_c?
On 04/03/201
It would be breaking only if somebody were using a database backend where it's
NOT a keyword and also had a mapper field called "blob", right?
Seems pretty unlikely, but that's just my opinion.
-Ross
On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Jim Barrows wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Mads Hartmann
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Mads Hartmann Jensen wrote:
> This has already been on reviewboard and comitted to master - should i send
> out a breaking change note?
>
> I'm not sure i get why this is a breaking change though?
>
Not sure if it is. However it's certainly something folks will w
This has already been on reviewboard and comitted to master - should i send out
a breaking change note?
I'm not sure i get why this is a breaking change though?
On 04/03/2010, at 22.07, Jim Barrows wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
> wrote:
> Is blob a standard rese
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote:
> Is blob a standard reserved word or only on MySQL?
> If the latter this is a potential breaking change.
>
Blob is not apparently part of the ANSI standard reserved word for SQL. I
would have sworn it was. However, it is common in Oracl
Is blob a standard reserved word or only on MySQL?
If the latter this is a potential breaking change.
-
Mads Hartmann wrote:
Ah! That fixed it, thanks a lot Jeppe ;)
I'm not sure what to say in the ticket though, the column-name blob
was a bad choise made by m
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Mads Hartmann wrote:
> Ah! That fixed it, thanks a lot Jeppe ;)
>
> I'm not sure what to say in the ticket though, the column-name blob
> was a bad choise made by me.
Yes, but lift tries to be clever and changes the column name if it
matches a reserved word (look a
12 matches
Mail list logo