Hi all,
The scala-2.7.5.final.zip can't downlaod, if anyone knows another
link that can download ?
scala-2.7.5.final.zip
http://www.scala-lang.org/downloads/distrib/files/scala-2.7.5.final.zip
So I want to know that the scala-2.7.6 whether works with lift1.1
well ?
Thanks very m
Here's a snippet:
object parentOrganization extends SessionVar[Box[Organization]](Empty)
def create(xhtml: NodeSeq): NodeSeq = {
var name: String = ""
def processAdd() = {
if (name.isEmpty)
S.error("Please provide a name")
else {
val organization = new Organi
> We have a large multi-module project that includes scala in a few key
> artifacts and things are going somewhat smoothly. However, I think most of
> the devs are bailing out of eclipse for intellij.
I just downloaded IntelliJ IDEA CE with the scala plugin and it's
really very nice. I think the
Neil,
You do not need to download the scala distro ahead of time - maven
will automatically download the right jars for you if they don't exist
in your local repo.
Lift does not and will not work with 2.7.6 - that was a broken scala
release.
Cheers, Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Oct 200
Hi all, I've just tried the PaginatedSnippet and is willing to make
some query pages with it, but the url parameter looks not very good (I
got a "/post?F1054255562605UD5=_ ").
So —— how to make paginated page's url more friendly? I'd prefer
something like "/posts?page=2".
--~--~-~--~~
done. thanks for you concern.
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues#issue/109
On Oct 18, 2:27 pm, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:
> Could you please file a ticket?http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/issues
>
> Cheers, Indrajit
>
> On 18/10/09 11:19 AM, night_stalker wrote:
>
>
>
> > Currently lift-openid
Well you declare the session-var as holding a Box[Organization]
but you're setting it as:
parentOrganization(organization)
wher organization is not a Box.
so it should be:
parentOrganization(Full(organization))
// this unless you have some implicits to transform an Oraganization
to a Box[Org
F1054255562605UD5 means that a function on server side will be invoked
when this is sent. I believe these is a function that the Paginator is
binding automatically. Is there a more specific reason why you want
this ?
Br's,
Marius
On Oct 18, 11:12 am, night_stalker wrote:
> Hi all, I've just tri
That means i can't use scala-2.7.6 with lift1.1 ?
Now my scala version is 2.7.4 whether it work with lift1.1 ?
Thank you very much.
Cheers,
Neil
On Oct 18, 4:01 pm, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> Neil,
>
> You do not need to download the scala distro ahead of time - maven
> will automatically
Then I would have two tables I suggest. But thank you nevertheless, it
is not so
important, I can live with fields mapping single columns ;). I only
wanted to reduce
some redundancy and was interested if it is possible to build such
types.
On Oct 18, 12:23 am, David Pollak
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct
On 18/10/09 3:58 PM, Neil.Lv wrote:
>
>
> That means i can't use scala-2.7.6 with lift1.1 ?
No you can't and shouldn't.
>
> Now my scala version is 2.7.4 whether it work with lift1.1 ?
Move to scala version 2.7.5, that's what is recommended at the moment.
But then again, you don't need to do
Thank you for your explanation.
The reason is users don't get the same page with the same url,
and, they can't read the url.
Just wondering if I can use existing classes or should write my own.
It seems I shouldn't use stateful snippet for this, "stateless"
requirement.
Best regards.
On Oct 18
There are very few things truly stateless in lift such as
LiftRules.statelessDispatchTable. Once you bind functions Lift creates
a name for these functions. These names are quite opaque (I think Dave
wanted to add a mechanism to allow users to specify their own
naming ...). For each page rendering
On Oct 17, 7:44 pm, TylerWeir wrote:
> Like CRUDify?
>
> http://www.scala-tools.org/mvnsites-snapshots/liftweb/lift-mapper/sca...
Perfect, thank you!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To
OK, I've run into an issue that makes me really uncomfortable.
java.util.Calender is generally 1-based for fields, except for month of
year, which is zero-based. This inconsistency has bled through to the
TimeHelpers API. I can't just change this, because that would break a lot of
code, possibly at
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Neil.Lv wrote:
>
>
> That means i can't use scala-2.7.6 with lift1.1 ?
>
> Now my scala version is 2.7.4 whether it work with lift1.1 ?
>
To reinforce what Tim and Indrajit have said, whatever version of Scala you
have installed on your machine for the purposes o
Another approach would be to use a lookup table of durations using
LongMappedMapper etc.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:49 AM, hyperion wrote:
>
> Then I would have two tables I suggest. But thank you nevertheless, it
> is not so
> important, I can live with fields mapping single columns ;). I only
>
There's now some support to deserialize parameterized types in that
experimental branch. For instance, these all work:
implicit val formats = Serialization.formats(TypeHints(classOf
[Animal] :: Nil))
case class Animals(animals: List[Animal])
trait Animal
case class Dog(name: String) exte
Does this code look ok?
def createDisplay(blogs:List[Blog]):NodeSeq = {
{
for {blog <- blogs} yield {blog.url} {blog.displayScore}
}
}
def render = { bind("joop" -> createDisplay(blogs)) }
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Does this code look ok?
def createDisplay(blogs:List[Blog]):NodeSeq = {
{
for {blog <- blogs} yield {blog.url} {blog.title}
}
}
def render = { bind("joop" -> createDisplay(blogs)) }
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message be
Two points.
1. Could you explain in more detail the advantage of a friendly URL?
2. Keep in mind that it's "safer" for MVC frameworks to implement such a
scheme, because you only use pagination on a page which is designed with
pagination in mind. In Lift, with View First, pagination co
I think so... Does it compile?
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, jack wrote:
>
> Does this code look ok?
>
>
> def createDisplay(blogs:List[Blog]):NodeSeq = {
>
>
>{
> for {blog <- blogs} yield {blog.url} a> {blog.title}
> }
>
> }
>
> def render = { bind("joop" -> createD
yes. I think I found the problem elsewhere in the logic. thanks.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote:
> I think so... Does it compile?
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:13 PM, jack wrote:
>
>>
>> Does this code look ok?
>>
>>
>> def createDisplay(blogs:List[Blog]):NodeSeq =
Hi,
How to set the uniqueFieldId for a mapper.
Following is the sample code how I set the uniqueFieldId.
object colpos extends MappedInt(this){
override def validations = checkForColPos _ :: super.validations
override def uniqueFieldId=Full("abc")
def checkForColPos(pos:Int) = {
Try fld.uniqueFieldId openOr ""
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:19 PM, sunanda wrote:
>
> Hi,
> How to set the uniqueFieldId for a mapper.
>
> Following is the sample code how I set the uniqueFieldId.
>
>
> object colpos extends MappedInt(this){
> override def validations = checkForColPos _ :: supe
Hi Naftoli,
Thank you so much. It works now.
Sunanda
On Oct 19, 2:28 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote:
> Try fld.uniqueFieldId openOr ""
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:19 PM, sunanda wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > How to set the uniqueFieldId for a mapper.
>
> > Following is the sample code how I set the
I use Lift in Eclipse with m2eclipse. I create the projects from within
Eclipse.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:01 AM, johncch wrote:
>
> > We have a large multi-module project that includes scala in a few key
> > artifacts and things are going somewhat smoothly. However, I think most
> of
> > the d
27 matches
Mail list logo
