Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread David Kastrup
Francisco Vila writes: > 2012/3/10 David Kastrup : >>> I tend to agree, but cannot resist to mention that your claim is >>> incorrect. It's not clearly noted on all download-page (some don't >>> even mention 10.4 as the lowest supported version). The remark is >>> missing afaics on the pages in C

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread ole
Am 10.03.2012 um 11:22 schrieb Colin Hall: >> I'm not top posting. > > Tim McNamara bitstream.net> writes: >> >> 2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on >> my > MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8. >> > > Thanks for the report, Tim. I also heard from James W

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/3/10 David Kastrup : >> I tend to agree, but cannot resist to mention that your claim is >> incorrect. It's not clearly noted on all download-page (some don't >> even mention 10.4 as the lowest supported version). The remark is >> missing afaics on the pages in Czech (cs), Hungarian (hu), Japa

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread David Kastrup
Hans Aikema writes: > On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote: >>> There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version >>> 2.14.2. >> I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page >> clearly says "MacOS

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread James
Hello again, On 10 March 2012 10:38, Hans Aikema wrote: > On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote: >>> >>> There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version >>> 2.14.2. >> >> I'd use different terminology.  The lil

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread James
hello, On 10 March 2012 10:38, Hans Aikema wrote: > On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote: >>> >>> There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version >>> 2.14.2. >> >> I'd use different terminology.  The lilypond

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread Hans Aikema
On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote: There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version 2.14.2. I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page clearly says "MacOS X 10.7 Lion is not yet supported.".

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-10 Thread Colin Hall
> I'm not top posting. Tim McNamara bitstream.net> writes: > > 2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on > my MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8. > Thanks for the report, Tim. I also heard from James Worlton. Updated status below. In this table below "ok" mea

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-09 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote: > > There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version > 2.14.2. I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page clearly says "MacOS X 10.7 Lion is not yet supported.". As such, any failure to run on 10.7 i

Re: Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-09 Thread Tim McNamara
2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on my MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Status of Lilypond for MacOS X

2012-03-09 Thread Colin Hall
Hi, There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version 2.14.2. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2338 The symptoms are that double-clicking the Lilypond icon results in a crash report from MacOS X. This issue has been fixed in the development stream and a recent