2012/3/10 :
> FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
> candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
Now I think understand the whole point of this alternative form of
distribution. Every fan of an OS or distribution is also a fan of its
package type. Windows users prefer doub
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:15:57AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:49 AM, wrote:
> > By and large, the project is already providing what FreeBSD
> > LilyPond users want and need: a good product, built from clean,
> > open source code which is highly portable to run o
Hello,
Von: Graham Percival
>Technical reasons? not many. Cultural reasons? they don't like
>binaries.
Actually, there are two significant technical reasons: the official FreeBSD
packages are usually
a bit behind on updates, and if you're running an older version of FreeBSD,
packages may
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:49 AM, wrote:
> By and large, the project is already providing what FreeBSD
> LilyPond users want and need: a good product, built from clean,
> open source code which is highly portable to run on a variety of
> platforms. Well done, all of you.
Hi Jim,
would you by a
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:08:45AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> >> Remember: I don't use FreeBSD. Only you can answer this question and
> >> thus tell us in what way what we are offering currently is a waste of
> >> time and effort.
> >
> > Nah, I can answer the question. :)
> >
> > Relax. H
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:00:43PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> So what is the difference as compared to the version on the LilyPond
> download page? What makes the download for FreeBSD that we offer less
> desirable?
I am only one person, and I cannot make global, objective
statements about
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:00:43PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
>>
>> > Forgive me, I don't mean to be evasive. The official FreeBSD
>> > ports tree includes only 2.14.2 at present (as the print/lilypond
>> > port). Given that a call f
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:00:43PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
>
> > Forgive me, I don't mean to be evasive. The official FreeBSD
> > ports tree includes only 2.14.2 at present (as the print/lilypond
> > port). Given that a call for testers was made recently, I
>
lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 01:33:01AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason you don't want to answer Francisco's question? Is
>> there a reason you don't want to tell FreeBSD users why they should
>> prefer your "ad-hoc port" over the official distribu
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 01:15:39PM -0800, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
> This port provides a minimal framework compatible with the
> FreeBSD ports system which permits any ports-enabled BSD system
> to use standard BSD management tools (portupgrade, pkg_delete,
> etc.) to build, package, install,
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 01:33:01AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Is there a reason you don't want to answer Francisco's question? Is
> there a reason you don't want to tell FreeBSD users why they should
> prefer your "ad-hoc port" over the official distribution for FreeBSD?
>
> > What version
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:59:34AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Francisco Vila writes:
>
> > 2012/3/10 :
> >> FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
> >> candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
> >>
> >> ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
> >
> > What m
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/3/10 :
>> FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
>> candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
>>
>> ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
>
> What makes it different from http://lilypond.org/unix.html#Download-3 ?
I'd rather say
lilyp...@umpquanet.com writes:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:51:01AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2012/3/10 :
>> > FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
>> > candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
>> >
>> > ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
>>
>> Wh
2012/3/10 :
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:51:01AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2012/3/10 :
>> > FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
>> > candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
>> >
>> > ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
>>
>> What makes it differen
I must correct my omission of acknowledging the help of Pietro
Cerutti in creating this port. His expertise and assistance is
greatly appreciated.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:40:20PM -0800, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
> FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
> candidate ma
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:51:01AM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2012/3/10 :
> > FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
> > candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
> >
> > ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
>
> What makes it different from http://lilypon
2012/3/10 :
> FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
> candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
>
> ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
What makes it different from http://lilypond.org/unix.html#Download-3 ?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.o
FreeBSD users who wish to test the recently-released 2.15.33
candidate may download an ad-hoc port from:
ftp://umpquanet.com/pub/lilypond-devel-2.15.33.tar
To install it, you should first de-install any previously
existing version of lilypond.
Then, as root:
# cd /usr/ports
# tar xvf /tmp/lilyp
19 matches
Mail list logo
